I didn’t assume you were speaking for yourself. I said “if.” If we’re going to talk about comprehension, let’s at least read the sentence accurately.
Yes, party leadership deserves criticism. They mishandled the transition and limited the primary. That’s fair.
But at the end of the day, voters still make choices. Shrugging your shoulders and letting fascism spread isn't really a solid strategy. It just avoids responsibility.
You can criticize the party and still acknowledge that refusing to act made things worse. Both can be true. Denying that doesn’t make it more principled. It just makes it convenient.
I’m not blaming the victims. Although I would consider the victims being the ones who voted for Harris or couldn’t vote at all.
If you voted for Trump, you are an idiot. If you didn’t vote, you’re an even bigger idiot.
If you think both parties are the same, then in your analogy, there are no victims.
Take responsibility for your actions or inactions. If you know things are bad and knew things would be worse by not voting for Harris, you are to blame.
Ok assuming we find a cannibal, shouldn’t we be locking them up instead of deporting them? They could even try them in a state with the death penalty. I am not sure how she thought this was a win.
They are going to put everyone’s retirement into the money pile, pull their money out, and then shrug when it collapses. How could we have predicted this?
But Harris didn’t say she was going to solve all the world’s problems immediately! She wanted to personally murder every single Palestinian person. Or something.
Don’t just vote for them, go canvass, knock on doors so they become viable. Shrugging your shoulders and knowingly selecting the option that will do LESS THAN nothing, when the alternative is fascism, it’s pouring gas on the fire!
And they have such a narrow view of EVERY issue. If you can’t solve EVERYTHING all at once, in EXACTLY the way they want, you may as well be Trump and want to personally murder every Palestinian in Gaza.
“You don’t understand that guy/lady isn’t going to solve EVERYTHING so let’s not try to repair ANYTHING!”
I didn’t assume you were speaking for yourself. I said “if.” If we’re going to talk about comprehension, let’s at least read the sentence accurately.
Yes, party leadership deserves criticism. They mishandled the transition and limited the primary. That’s fair.
But at the end of the day, voters still make choices. Shrugging your shoulders and letting fascism spread isn't really a solid strategy. It just avoids responsibility.
You can criticize the party and still acknowledge that refusing to act made things worse. Both can be true. Denying that doesn’t make it more principled. It just makes it convenient.