No one is really talking about AI as inherently bad. It's current implementation is impossible to separate from consolidated ownership by big tech and environmental rape in the name of delivering a technology that has no clear use case to the end consumer yet.
Just because people don't want unpack all of that nuance for pedants like you doesn't mean it isn't there.
Until AI means something different than the transgressive genAI integration and resource hoarding of big Tech - indeed until AI is no longer synonymous with Big Tech, then all of this wretched handwringing you're engaging in over the distinction between the two will continue to be useless, meaningless, and fucking annoying.
Spend your time on something useful. Would you like a new prompt?
If you think it has nothing to do with the working class struggle you need to go back to square one and begin again. There isn't much that isn't impacted by the rise of AI.
You kid but let's not be hasty. Used to be a Republican considering a run for president would, like a Democrat, publish a memoir to start generating interest and chatter about a campaign. For a modern Republican, an underage sex scandal fills a similar function and you don't have to pay ghost writers.
Resist the feeling of inevitability.
Resist everything.
The good guys aren't coming to save us. We have to do this.