Rightly so, they are a threat to democracy. They shouldn't be trusted in any position of authority or public service or we risk them using those positions to betray the Republic whenever Trump asked them to.
"What do you mean by life, then?" Is what you could have asked but instead you wrote two paragraphs arguing against the strawman you created for yourself to play with. I won't get in the way, keep playing with yourself.
The issue and the demographic of the voter are immaterial. If you refuse to vote based on one issue then you give up your influence over all the other issues as well. You don't have to like it or think it's just, or fair, or right. It's about whether you will use the political power you do have to influence the things that will affect you or not.
Being Arab or Muslim or black or white or Christian or athiest or young or old, or anything else, doesn't matter in regard to whether you use the power you have or not.
One of the two options will get chosen. Abstaining only increases the chance the worse of the options for you is more likely. Being a single issue voter and not voting if that single issue isn't what you want is irresponsible to yourself. Whoever wins will affect your life in a myriad of ways beyond that single issue and throwing away your influence over that, as small as it may be, is simply foolish. If you aren't also participating in the systems that choose the candidates, nevermind finding and supporting politicians who do reflect your values, you're doing a disservice to yourself.
That such studies aren't mandatory prior to general release was purchased by lobbyist for companies that want the freedom to risk our well being for profit.
They'll go after each demographic whose voting habits favour democrats: Immigrants, women, educated, non-christian, poor, lbgtq+, young, non-white. Whichever ones you belong to, makes you a potential target of voter disenfranchisement. At he same time making it easier for: old, male, white, Christian, wealthy, uneducated, straight, multi-generational American.
It's a basic part of cognition to compare things when claims of are made about something being the worst. Any 'whataboutism' is your own bias projection. Why do you want to erase the victims of other slavery systems from the conversation?
Choosing the lesser of two evils is life. Welcome to it. You don't always get to choose your options and mitigating the worst is a responsibility. Trump was easily the worst, and also supports the genocide. But Republicans couldn't seem to figure that out. Apparently just like you.
Rightly so, they are a threat to democracy. They shouldn't be trusted in any position of authority or public service or we risk them using those positions to betray the Republic whenever Trump asked them to.