Homie, haven't you ever walked around downtown in a city? There's markings like this spray painted all over the sidewalks. It's to mark things for construction. It's not graffiti, and it doesn't say AI either because the side of the first letter is straight. https://www.reddit.com/r/Construction/comments/16f5695/sidewalk_markings/
- Posts
- 3
- Comments
- 647
- Joined
- 12 mo. ago
- Posts
- 3
- Comments
- 647
- Joined
- 12 mo. ago
If you zoom in on it you can see she's gripping it with her thumb in front and her fingers in back to stabilize it. Picture holding a sign and a pinch grip between your thumb and fingers as you walk. Then raise your hand and hold it up. Your thumb will be facing out and your fingers will be facing the same direction as your back. That's what she's doing here.
Oh God can we not just call everything we dislike AI? This isn't AI. Look at the street view pics. And her hand makes sense - just zoom in on it. She's clutching the sign with her thumb in front and four fingers behind, probably because that's how she was carrying it before raising it. The wall is constantly being repainted, the door looks exactly like that. The line on the cardboard is due to the seam in the cardboard - haven't you ever written on cardboard before? Are you kidding me? We KNOW people out there support ICE. You think an ICE worker sat around to make this image? If you want to accuse them of faking this, you'd have an easier time saying they just sent their own employee out there to hold the sign up.
Fuck, it looks like the average /pol/ thread in here. I remember when they were looking at stills from the Charlie Kirk assassination video and saying that his ring switched hands and that it's proof that it's AI generated and he's actually still out there alive somewhere. Be better than that. Get your heads out of your asses, and remember: the more you WANT something to be true, the more wary you should be to believe evidence of it, because you're biased.
Wow, super cool! So I take it they're not good for medical imaging? Either go right through too easily to cast a shadow or harmful in some way? The truck scanner stuff is cool though, albeit a bit surveillancey. I'm sure archaeologists would love to have portable muon tomography though! I wonder what else this will end up being used for... Seems like there's surely lots of possibilities left.
Are some people just built different that they can do this? Is there any medical research on the physiological ramifications of insertions this large? It doesn't even seem physically possible, yet there it is.
Thank you for saying it so I didn't have to. It's so disappointing to see people on "my side" say dumb crap like "wait so if ur anti antifa that means ur calling urself fascist haha 🕵️♂️🕵️♂️🧠 Q.E.D republikkkan". Like fuck me. Just like you said it's the same shit as Republicans saying "oh you're socialist??? Google what Nazi stands for sweaty 🤭🤗"
You'd think people would learn not to use shitty reasoning when it's used against them. But it seems like instead people only care that the reasoning is bad if it contradicts them. And as soon as they want to throw things at their enemy they'll pick up whatever flawed garbage they can, not worried about how it reflects on them or how it undermines the state of reasonable public discourse. Any weapon is valid as long as it's used against the Enemy. So disappointing.
Note: My rant against people here is not directed at OP who seems to be genuinely confused about the dynamic of misrepresentative naming. And to clarify further, it doesn't matter that antifa isn't a misrepresentative name: it's opponents think it is.
Nobel prize lowkey pmo fr. Like who actually gives a shit about it? ESPECIALLY the peace prize, which has basically been a shiny version of being the Time person of the year since before I was born.
It feels like if you just build an elaborate enough Rube Goldberg machine for killing someone it suddenly isn't considered murder anymore.
Don't think the fact that corporations use VPNs will protect us. There are all sorts of products that are legal for corporate purchase but not for individuals. Typically dangerous equipment, chemicals, tools, etc. The precedent is there as long as you can establish that a VPN is dangerous or unfit for the public. I'm very sure this will be the angle taken for Phase 2 of the "finally fuck up the internet for everyone" plan.
I was thinking that they were seeing AI generated protest videos and saying that this means there are actually no protests and everyone loves Trump.
I think this is worse? At least the first way would involve awareness about AI video's ability to mislead.
🤷♂️ The two national guard members I know are left-leaning and liked the idea of helping people, of course yes for money, but understandably so. But yeah, I guess I can't say "most". I do think that most of the jerks are still more drawn to the actual army though, and that does definitely help the jerk ratio of the national guard.
Exactly. Most people who sign up for that are actually pretty cool people. Their nobility is being taken advantage of. Now, one could argue that the "I'm just following orders" excuse is no good. On the other hand. I bet a lot of them are going to be doing some malicious compliance, effectively pretending to follow orders by showing up, but just doing nothing the whole time.
All politicians are united in their love of surveillance, as it allows them to subjugate the population via panopticon-induced threats. "We are always watching, so don't try anything"
My issue is that the ones who aren't bothering you with it are essentially not doing so because they know other people in their group are already handling that for them. Religions, especially those you named, come with a mandate to spread themselves and force others to comply with their standards.
It's kind of like a really selfish kid who would steal all your lunch every day, but he's not strong enough to do so, so instead he's just nice and kind and smiles at you and lets you be. But if he ever gets strong enough, he'll start taking your lunch every single day forever.
The religious people who aren't forcing it down your throat either (1) think someone else is doing it for them so they don't have to, or (2) don't think they could get away with it without being counterproductive to their cause, and are waiting for a more opportune moment.
These are people who believe that they factually know what constitutes objective good. Imagine if raping children was legal and you knew your neighbor was raping children. You might just leave him alone about it because, what can you do? But the moment you have an opportunity to vote for a law to outlaw it, the moment you have a chance to kill him and get away with it, etc. you'll try to act against him. Your polite indifference to him is a lie, because from your perspective he is committing an absolute and unforgivable wrongdoing that MUST be stopped. This is how religious people are to you, except for instead of it being about reasonable things like raping children, it's about stupid bullshit that makes no sense, like the fact you don't pray every day at a certain time, or the fact that you're attracted to the same sex, or the fact that you don't want the ten commandments posted in schools.
I feel ya, I also generally am very against "it's just common sense!" type reasoning. But have you ever spent time with, like special education students? Like someone who will need to live with their parents forever because they can't learn to do things like read or write? It's nice to believe that maybe if only they had been given the right environment, they wouldn't have those problems - it's also just not true. Or perhaps we can take a more extremely example of someone who suffered a major brain injury. It sucks, and it's unfair, but at the end of the day some people really are definitively less smart than others. And by that same token, those others are definitively more smart than them. Of course, once people are at a certain level, it gets a lot harder to tell, but that dynamic is still in play. Likewise, if you've ever had the experience of interacting with a gifted kid, it's pretty clear that they're smarter than others.
That's a good distinction about intelligence being generally advantageous. That is why I said generally - it has some clear disadvantages like loneliness or a deeper awareness of the world's problems, etc. But most of the time, being smart is advantageous, don't you think? I mean, what is intelligence other than an ability to correctly understand reality? I do agree that sometimes having a false understanding of reality can coincidentally help you out, but knowing how things really are is certainly the superior strategy. If you think otherwise, it's always easy to make yourself dumber and reap the rewards. I don't mean that sarcastically or cruelly. I just mean, there's a reason we don't see intelligent people lobotomizing themselves to have better lives.
Agreed the chart only shows correlation and not causation in either direction.
Did something just happen? I'm browsing new and this is like the fourth post I've seen about it. Way more than usual.
I hate to be negative but I just can't resist commenting on the dismal state of what counts as a win for the people nowadays. Our advertisements will now be quieter than the main content. Yes! Finally I can put aside my moral qualms about bringing new children into this world
I mean, while it's true that IQ tests aren't a great measure of intelligence, it's not like all humans are equally intelligent. We all know some people who are clearly smart and some people who are clearly dumb. And I think it's completely expected that being smarter gives you some advantage at getting money. I don't think anyone can reasonably deny that being smart is generally advantageous in life. This chart seems perfectly fair and reasonable to me...there is a slight correlation, moreso on the low end (how can severely mentally retarded people do most jobs or even have incomes?), and less so on the high end. It makes a mistake in talking about income rather than net worth, which is really the more pertinent thing in "being rich". I bet we would see a much lower correlation there, because you can be born into having a high net worth. But the correlation isn't too high, because, as everyone reasonable already suspected, being rich is almost entirely about being lucky. I don't think this chart really has any import to the many social discussions about meritocracy or wealth or intelligence, except for maybe to disprove someone who believes that we live in a fair world where "if you're smart and work hard you can make it". But even then, that would rely on a misunderstanding of what the chart tells us.
Basically, I'm not sure what you're getting at with this.
Them reposting it definitely constitutes propaganda, but I think it's important not to just call it AI when it isn't. And anyways, the best propaganda isn't blatant falsehoods. Everyone working themselves up into a furor thinking that this is AI just makes us look like a bunch of morons who will believe anything that suits their worldviews. Isn't that exactly what we supposedly look down on the other side for? Or is it okay to embrace all their values and techniques, until both sides just become mirror images of each other?
Truth is a critically important thing. We must never put truth to the side in favor of merely feeling right. When you put your wishes and feelings over truth, that creates the cracks by which a movement becomes corrupted and deranged.