What's the deal with confusing Open Source with Free Software Licences. It literaly says it in the wiki, this is a Free Software Licence not Open Source. Stop trying to change the meaning of things. I cannot believe google won with their Open Source washing and now everybody thinks Free Software is Open Source.
They have completely different meanings in every aspect. Please stop falling for the Open Source washing term that corpos like so much and learn to differentiate them.
Well RISCV changes a bit the paradigm. With x86 x64 or arm whatever the manufacturers had to pay a licence and sign a contract that limited what they could manufacture and probably didn't allow for disclosure of information. Only licenced partners could build their own chips based on those architectures.
With RISCV is different, there's no licence for manufacturing RISCV chips, anybody can do it. No contract needed.
Arduino is an example of that. They used their own MCU and gave it free "libre", that's why there're so many arduino copies that are just the same.
Yeah let's fight censorship with more censorship!! Total isolation!
If you isolate the users of feddit then you won't help them on having different views.