Tatsächlich stimmt das nicht: Wenn du Affen vor eine Schreibmaschine stellst, tippen sie ein paar mal auf die gleiche Taste und gehen wieder. Mach mit diesem wissen was du willst
I love how much you over analyze this stpid meme so upvotes from me.
Still, and just for the sake of argument, your elaboration would justify the following responses: (note that this list is not exhaustive)
You are old enough to help yourself.
Does mom already known? / Have you told mom?
I'm too far out, go take a taxi / I'll call you a taxi.
I can't come but I'm here for you when you want to talk or text with me.
While this list is far from exhaustive, consciously not included is muting the conversion and shutting their child off. The point of the meme is that dad ignores child instead of helping or supporting them in any way.
And to finally enter the meta level: I don't think this is real. I think it's photoshoped or something, doesn't look like AI but more likely than not it's fake
True, liberal media has a bias problem. They are so proud of being neutral, showing both sides, facts and alternative facts. This might sound like a good idea until you realize the implication that there are only two sides of the story. While facts are objective, there is an infinite amount of alternative facts you can come up with. It's much easier to spread bullshit than to debunk it, still both get the same coverage. That's why I like alternative media so much, so facts, still more perspectives.
we're looking at a word that means the exact same thing as a number of other words nobody cares to censor.
So why not use them instead? Why insist on this one word when there are enough to choose from?
And is this really the case? I'm not a native speaker but I consume a lot of English media, including old books, and never have I encountered it as anything other than a derogatory term to mentally disabled people. And let me remind you that you made this convention about censorship, I didn't. I just wrote a short comment, ready to move on, you bombarded me with paragraphs of comments. I'm just feeding the troll at this point and maybe I shouldn't.
So you are much more part of the mechanism that divides people which is a poor argument in my opinion anyway. It's often used to silence people who fight for marginalized groups and "divide the working class". I'm not saying that you used it that way, but neither am I part of a witch hunt for suggesting not to use that word.
And what is all the talk about "monied campaigns"? Who has the monetary interest to cancel this word? I really don't get this point.
Besser als ein Baum an dem Adamsäpfel hängen