Not bringing a phone to a protest is a govts wet dream. Bring a burner phone. The real issue, assuming signal jamming, is how to propagate video chunks thru a mesh network until node(s) find working Internet connection(s) and the video chunks can be distributed out to multiple servers.
Also would be nice to be connected to coordinators to break up mob into cells with distributed specific targets.
Why do we have to suck at what we do?
Seeing police with riot gear in a phalanx, and crowds pushed against them. Looks like failure to me; lost opportunity. Where in da f are the coordinators?
Everyone commenting have read and understood the article. Perhaps the nuance of the conversation is just going over your head. Your commentary is your personal opinion, which is outside of the source material. What you copy+pasted is exactly what we've commented on.
The article never said "reviewing Gnome extensions, where LLM was used, is a huge waste of time". You are adding to what's said. The adults are not pulling from outside the article.
We are stating what the article lacks. We are not hallucinating. So if we are not hallucinating then you must not be following. Reread it a few times until you get it.
A saner organization would also hit up submitters for a reviewer's fee. This would reduce AI spam. Barriers to entry matter.
A reviewers fee is equivalent to Canonical offering customer support contracts. Obviously a person that needs to lean on AI as a crutch, is just screaming out for reviewers to act as advisers. The reviewer just wielding the giant DENIED stamp is fun, but doesn't address the issue of noobs implicitly asking to work with a consultant.
gnome reviewers obviously never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity.
They should state a justification. Not merely what they are looking for to identify AI generated code.
The justification could be the author is unlikely to be capable of maintenance. In which case the extension is just going to inconvenience/burden onto others.
So far their is no justification stated besides, da fuk and yuk.
What the hell is a centralist within the context of OP's topic? The folks just observing and doing nothing no laughing no photos? People who took car that day?
Is there such a thing as a centralist? That's like saying, "somewhere on the line". Whereas if you look at my comments i'm everywhere on the line. Trying to imagine how to advocate a centralist viewpoint but coming up with nothing.
Am i a gang member? No. So that leaves you and me in the same group, "fcked". Anarchist is a merely a superfluous label. Even if our views didn't 100% align perfectly, the same ills affect us both.
Unless you are interested in recruiting me in some gang. Errr are you?
You argued we don't live in a socialist society. Which is a typical argument by those schooled about the fallacy of that capitalism exists.
Laid out what we actually live under without isms, besides indulging in using the term, lawyerism. You are trying to argue economics. As am i.
Usually neither side dares to describe reality and instead each side just repeats their favorite theory from public school textbooks. I just described what my lying eyes see.
as well as Apache