Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)K

koper

@ koper @feddit.nl

Posts
1
Comments
261
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • and also when you do now that i think about it

    Jump

  • I think they mean uPnP

  • Corrupting Data

    Jump

  • 11110000 10011111 10001101 10000110

  • ich🪿iel

    Jump

  • *Tauberhaft

  • The Aldi Rule

    Jump

  • The military industrial complex

  • Google Calendar removed events like Pride and BHM because its holiday list wasn’t ‘sustainable’

    Jump

  • Be that as it may, the real motivation for this change likely has nothing to with "less clutter" and more with pandering to the MAGA crowd.

  • Removed

    Nobody hates working together with leftists more than leftists

    Jump

  • Skill issue. If you don't know how to cook meatless dishes that are at least as good, you're really missing out.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Are you free tonight? Because I don't have any money.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Tbh Star Trek also has a fair share of inconsistencies and flawless characters. But any argument about which is "better" is pointless.

  • Facebook flags Linux topics as 'cybersecurity threats' — posts and users being blocked

    Jump

  • Turns out when Zuckerbot was talking about "allowing more speech on the platform", he just meant more slurs.

  • What's the best way to add a secondary drive?

    Jump

  • How does that increase the risk compared to something like JBOD or overlayfs? In both cases you will lose data if a drive fails. Keep in mind that this is btrfs raid0, not regular raid. If anything that decreases the chance of corruption because the metadata is redundantly stored on both drives.

  • So, you've found the light. You are now a penguin herder...

    Jump

  • No mention of systemd? This is unacceptable.

  • What's the best way to add a secondary drive?

    Jump

  • A disk failure will cause you to lose data, yes. But that's also the case in all the other solutions discussed here. Backups should be handled separately and are not part of the original question.

  • What's the best way to add a secondary drive?

    Jump

  • Have you considered simply setting btrfs to RAID 0?

  • Adults with ADHD live shorter lives than those without a diagnosis, a new study finds

    Jump

  • Both the article and the OP mention it.

    I understand your general point about ableism, I just don't see how that applies to this article. I don't read anything about "making the patient more beneficial to others".

  • Adults with ADHD live shorter lives than those without a diagnosis, a new study finds

    Jump

  • How does living a longer life through better exercise and diet not "benefit the patient"?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Rule of Acquisition 229: Latinum lasts longer than lust.

  • App stores unconvinced by Trump's pause of TikTok ban, which may be on shaky legal ground

    Jump

  • "May be on shaky legal ground"

    The law clearly states that Tiktok is banned and should be made inaccessible. The president cannot unilaterally change the law. They even got a lawyer to explain this to them.

    Regardless of what you think of the ban, there can be no doubt about the fact that this is what the law says. No matter what Trump claims. If journalists show this level of misregard for truth and the rule of law, things are going to become much worse.

  • Flirting with Trump is flirting with Nazism - Response to Andy Yen (CEO of Proton AG) on Reddit 📢📢📢

    Jump

  • The fight for privacy and digital freedom is inherently political.

  • Removed

    Is the World Becoming Uninsurable?

    Jump

  • Sure, but that doesn't fix any of the problems that this article highlights. Large areas of the globe are becoming unhabitable and yet the current policy is to keep people there through subsidies and legal threats for insurance companies instead of actual prevention and mitigation. Basically burying the head in the sand while everyone else is paying the price.

    To quote the article:

    If rebuilding a house destroyed in a "100 year flood" once made sense, now that there's a "100 year flood" every five years, rebuilding in that locale no longer makes sense. So why should taxpayers absorb the costs of this selective blindness to the realities of rising global risks?

    Solidarity and collectivization of risk is essential for things like healthcare, where your risk is almost entirely depending on luck. But for home disaster insurance, it depends much more kn where and how you choose to build. It then makes little sense why living in particularly dangerous areas should be subsidized. That money should rather go towards climate adaptation.