Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)J

john_brown [comrade/them]

@ john_brown @hexbear.net

Posts
7
Comments
1034
Joined
6 yr. ago

GI, your helicopters fall from the sky like broken birds

They cannot see you from their airplanes, GI, they come to bomb you

  • Rather than being reliant on the dusty, antiquated systems of a bygone era

    but I thought the dusty antiquated systems of a bygone era like toxic masculinity, not allowing women to be in the military, hating anybody who isn't cisgender (and also hating all women by default) were what made us strong???

  • I deal with a lot of "entrepreneur" small business tyrants and they are increasingly using AI instead of hiring IT staff. The AI is always wrong but it's confident and the small business tyrants are clueless rubes, so it can cause a lot of irritation when they just paste in a giant block of text from an LLM, including the preface where the LLM is telling them how great this output is to send to us and how it's concise and to the point while getting across that the client isn't a techy person but they've covered all their bases beforehand. It's to the point where if I get any communications from a client that have the hint of LLM generation I paste in a line about LLMs not being trained on our documentation and therefore cannot be useful for this purpose and will only waste the client's time and our own.

    I assume large corporations are run by very similar people who just have more resources and employees around them to tweak and adjust the outputs of the shitty LLM they use to think for them.

  • empire's sleeping, score some hits while the emperor naps or yells about venezuela or whatever

  • real "sat on my balls weird and now they hurt" kind of look

  • "You're all on my list now"

  • call it slapdick. it has nothing to do with playing the sport but it very accurately describes the players, in highschool at least.

  • When I read about the bungling attempts by American and European negotiators, envoys, etc, to work over Russia I often think about the difference in education between the two parties. Putin and his advisors are almost certainly all dyed in the wool neoliberals, but they have one significant advantage over their western neoliberal counterparts - they grew up in the Soviet Union and were taught some kind of material analysis rather than the tautologies and false truisms of a western liberal primary and secondary education. They have the basic foundational building blocks of real analysis while our western dingbats just think they're right because they're better.

  • That's a shame, I was already mentally plotting a short trip to look at them

  • Are those still in Houston?

  • taking another crack at it:

    CHATBOT BLOWS LEFTIST FORUM'S MIND BY SPEAKING PERFECT MAOIST STANDARD ENGLISH

  • here for the quirked up lefty LLM

  • acknowledged by EVERY historian

    lol fuck off mr making shit up

    All the posts opposing me, have consisted entirely of "America sucks, and you're stupid." It's okay, that's the level of political discourse I'm used to from dealing with MAGA Morons.

    guy who is too cowardly to reply to critiques and desperately needs to justify why he can't answer them says what

  • Yes

    Jump
  • on the rocks, with mysterious powdered crystals of some kind on the rim

  • I'm not sure why you feel the Senate is somehow the lone proof of the Founding Father's "secret tricks," that's a pretty weird hill to die on. And I wasn't aware that I was expected to define Democracy. I could easily do that, with a simple definition of "electing one's own leaders," but I'm sure you wouldn't accept that definition, nor literally any other definition I would offer, including verbatim quotes from accepted dictionaries.

    I don't feel it's the lone proof and nothing I've said would suggest that - I simply want you to respond to the critiques of the constitution which you have so far largely avoided. If you define democracy as electing one's own leaders, tell me about the electoral college. That's an institution that is very easy to understand as a handbrake on democracy - I'm sure even you can suss that one out if you spend a little time thinking about it. Work through that one and let me know how it's democratic.

    This forum has an agenda, and I understand that, but it's too bad that real debate isn't allowed here, just bad-faith confirmation bias.

    We'd love to debate you if you would actually address the critiques, but you won't. Is it because your undergrad degree was a participation trophy? Is it because you know you can't do it? Hard to say.

    You still didn't address the Senate at all. This is why I keep bringing it up. You refuse to address it. We can move on to the electoral college afterwards and even more explicit obvious anti-democratic levers the founders chose, but until then it's remedial debate with a guy who claims to want to debate but continues to be terrified of actually doing it.

    If you're not a teenager you should probably feel deeply embarrassed and just delete all of this and maybe rethink your life.

  • I don't read posts just comments

  • if you look at pictures of him in 1998 or whatever you begin to see the scope of the work he's had done, the guy probably can't move his upper lip area much

  • If they're using it for that it will absolutely be manipulated by big money to pressure changes in coverage