Not really, in this case the more literally you read the question the better. It asks what responsibility you acquire when you have a job not why you got the job.
Now we just need to either massively water down EU citizen and consumer protections or get the CPTPP members, including Singapore, to adopt and implement compatible rules.
Yes, until the Trump slashed the foreign aid to Pakistan in 2018. Since then they got much closer to China because they need someone to balance out Russian support for India.
There have been former Google employees saying they had solutions to deal with SEO, but they were vetoed by the ads side of business, since better results reduce "engagement".
It says that the president of the US has immunity for official acts which fall within their "exclusive sphere of constitutional authority". This aligns with the executive privileges in other democracies.
Of course it matters. States and laws work the way the general consensus says they work. One of the reasons Trump can get away with 90% of what he does is because public servants got fed the idea that the president of the US is above the law.
Because I mean fail and trying to frame everything as positive, or at worst, neutral is not healthy and will lead to people not acknowledging their feelings?
I think you are looking into things in a non healthy way.
You are right that success and failure are not binary. Furthermore, every system, be it physical, living, or social, fails sooner or later.
That doesn't mean we shouldn't strive to not fail for as long as possible, for if something brings joy or safety it's continued success is important. It follows that if something that's important to someone fails it's healthy to morn it and to try to learn from it to not repeat the same failure.
Not really, in this case the more literally you read the question the better. It asks what responsibility you acquire when you have a job not why you got the job.