Honestly, in the long term it has been less effort.
If you're an "out-od-the-box" comouter user (web browser, maybe one or two apps, and office suite, then stick with the more conventional distros. If you are very dynamic with your OS, especially 8f you play with a lot of different OSS applications, then Arch get's easier.
I am thinking of different "theys". I am not wait8ng for steam to give me a desktop. I am not waiting for kde to take this seriously.
I am hoping that some of the very talented teams that manage small wms, who come up with interesting ways to interact with your apps, to get interwsted in tue developer kit.
I think that I said it above, that I think that paperwn / niri / karousel are the best starting points.
I tuink that I understand what steam is selking, but I don't think that a windowed wm is ideal as a desktop with VR. I get that we are takking about a computer strapped to your head.
The karousel guy could take a stab at it, but if Steam releases a dev kit, then any team could try developing a wm with workflows that are designed around a VR interface.
They're releasing an SDK, which most likely will include a linux compatibility. Windowing desktops may not be the right starting point for a VR desktop, but hopefully some of the teams will grab the developers kit and consideration VR centric ways of working with applications.
The GFW is famed, not only for monitoring in and outgoing IP traffic, but also for precenting outgoing access to information services.
Broadly, access to information considered harmful to the CCP is restricted.
I've not heard much about phone/telephony calls being blocked.
What do your aunties use to talk? Regular telephones or signal?
Obama wasn't a great president. He was a good source of hope which made his weakness worse.
He pulled the US out of a financial crisis only to to go complwte centrist, folding on healthcare (which might have been the right strategic choice), folding on peace in the middle east, folding on socual support, folding on Russia, folding on the SC.
Obama contributed to Democratic decline in the world (through loss of trust in Democrstic instituions) during his term, and then lead to borh Trump and Biden.
Biden was a better president than Obama, despite being half there, and funneling the States towards Trump 2.0.
The significant representation described in the article is not "some ppl who may have moved".
Yes, they focused on MAGA in the article, but it doesn't make it less significant.