Programmer and sysadmin (DevOps?), wannabe polymath in tech, science and the mind. Neurodivergent, disabled, burned out, and close to throwing in the towel, but still liking ponies 🦄 and sometimes willing to discuss stuff.
Programmer and sysadmin (DevOps?), wannabe polymath in tech, science and the mind. Neurodivergent, disabled, burned out, and close to throwing in the towel, but still liking ponies 🦄 and sometimes willing to discuss stuff.
There is a long history of artists "pushing the envelope... by self-deprecating and making "statements" about how ridiculous the market for art is.
You don't get to shove Dada, a Campbell's soup can, canned "artist's shit", a black square on a canvas, a pile of trash, a shirt on a coat hanger, a self-shredding copy of a graffiti, and thousands of similar examples, all under the same label as the Louvre, illustrators, writers, etc... then magically have people value all artistic work.
There has been continuous, serious, self-damage done to the concept of "art", and now come the consequences: the general public, thinks the value of art is close to $0, and that's what they're willing to pay.
Coincidentally, AI companies allow anyone to get "better than literal shit" art done for $0... so... 🤷