Skip Navigation

√𝛂𝛋𝛆

@ j4k3 @piefed.world

Posts
73
Comments
389
Joined
8 mo. ago

  • In most altercations, the first to use violence is the likely winner. Unless you walk around with a knife in hand all the time, it is unlikely to make a difference. Even then, you must always be prepared because even holding a knife, you have blind spots to be exploited.

    I am tall with broad shoulders for my height. I think of my size as being an easier target for a bullet, though in practice I know that difference is rather insignificant. I look at displays of strength and force as weakness and fear. Even a kid can pull a trigger.

    I primarily fear groups of stupid people, and the intelligent. I am probably biased because I am too large and intimidating to be worth the effort to fight, and have little that anyone would want. No one can fight off several attackers at once. The human propensity for dogmatic stupidity and confirmation bias is horrendous. On the other hand, I fear the domination of the intelligent, because the human capacity for cleverness is beyond the scope of anyone's ability to counter.

    In pretty much every situation, you are safer if you run. Instead of working on fighting back, having sure footing, agility, and confidence in your ability to run faster and further than any opponent is far more likely to save you. Your stride is much shorter than mine, but you are likely to be able to change directions faster than me and my momentum. Like in american football, I must increase the buffer distance before engagement when facing a smaller person in order to prevent them using my momentum against me. When I am all out in pursuit, it is the moment just before contact that is critical for awareness, confidence, and the agility to change directions quickly that will prevent me from catching you. It is also a mistake to assume I will tire or lack endurance to chase. You must have a stronger spirit than your opponent and the confidence that you can out agility them every time they try. There is no fairness in this type of altercation. I know that is scary. It is always better to turn to flight first in the fight or flight mechanism. Then come back with your fight when you control more variables.

  • The proprietary code used in alignment of models. There are criminal and dubious mechanisms in this code. Once reverse engineered and exposed, this will burst the bubble of AI. This is the same system in all models.

  • What are your medical qualifications for this unsolicited medical advice?

  • I do not understand why fools rush these things and ruin good things. You're holding a gold mine and put it through a paper shredder for what?

  • The code is in the vocabulary.

  • 5 years. $125k was just the legal fees to break even.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Nope, he's Rimmed.

    Pro automotive painter here. Compare shirt's white text to hanky. Totally beige.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Don't get in this kind of trouble... Lasers do a remarkable and very disorienting job from a distance. The green pointers won't generally do damage but they fuck with your head on a whole different level from a distance. You'll swear they are actually doing damage if you are blinded by one. I've had asshole kids shine one at me commuting by bike at night. For a solid second or so, you will lose vision and be disoriented. Even a halfwit is not going to crash in that timespan, but it feels like someone turned off your brain for that second, like next level overload nonsense.

  • 🇹🇼IFNO HEN🇹🇼

  • I agree, but the tool is not to blame and never has been. This is not unique. The same thing was said with the advent of digital photo editing. Fakes predate that when people made them with film. In each instance, it is the ethics of the people that are the problem. At the deepest abstract levels, if you play out all of the implications, there is no difference between a tool and the thoughts in your head. Blaming tools is always a problem and only an illusion of a solution.

    I have been able to edit photos like this since before AI, but have never done so. When I was a kid in school I drew stuff like this. So the problems is actually intent and social accountability more than anything else.

    I don't like that the issue boils down to this. I think it is ugly, but I think the alternative is far far worse. I think those that are pushing this issue are convenient idiots combined with people that are hell bent on a fascist authoritarian future that is truly horrendous. If posting dubious child nudes of me will stop fascism and WW3, what poses would you like me to strike?

  • Look at the vocab.json of nearly any model vocabulary. In CLIP, it is organized at the end in the last ~2200 tokens of SD1 CLIP which is used by all diffusion models. The bulk of the code is in that last block, however there are 2337 tokens with code in a brainfuck style language using the extended Latin character set. Any idiot that looks at this will spot how these are not at all part of any language words or fragments and where there are obvious functions present. If you have ComfyUI, the file is in ./comfy/sd1_tokenizer/vocab.json.

    The most difficult are models, like the T5xxl have this code precompiled and embedded in the vocabulary.

    I am playing with Qwen 3's right now, which has the much larger world model of Open AI QKV hidden layers alignment. Unlike CLIP, Qwen's vocabulary starts as 2.8 MB of compressed json, and the extended Latin is intermixed in the total. This one is present in ComfyUI at ./comfy/text_encoders/qwen25_tokenizer/vocab.json. You will need the jq package to make the json readable, or other ways. If you have jq and ripgrep (rg) on your system, then try cat ./vocab.json | jq | LC_ALL=C rg '[[:^ascii:]]' That method is much less organized than CLIP, but this model has 103,378 lines of code using the same character set. I have reverse engineered most of the tokens used to create this code. I modify the vocabulary with scripts to alter behavior. Explaining the heuristics of how I have figured out the complexity of this structure is fucking hard unto itself, never mind actually sorting out any meaning. It really sucks when people are assholes about that.

  • Have you ever followed the citations I have given to the code present in the vocabulary, or do you just laugh at things you do not understand?

  • Did I somehow say it does, or is it me you have a problem with?

  • Holy fucking what? 19k frigz? Must know serious db ops to make that work. Like damn. I'm learning to navigate model vocab in the 50k to 200k lines range and that is just key/value strings and extended Unicode characters. How does one organize and find a relevant Chud GODfrog image in the holysea???

  • Democratic freedom and democracy in practice.

  • It will culminate in revising "minor" to something scientific. Age is arbitrary and impossible for AI alignment to handle. Neoteny and the Tanner Scale is visually present and real. That fundamentally shifts culture in large ways because retention of childlike traits is neoteny, and the scientific definition of beauty. That is well outside the scope of Anglo cultural awareness, and will be hard for the Puritan backwardness to adjust. Like Riley Reid is so popular because of her neoteny. Even with actors like Tom Cruise, the reason people like 'short people' in media is the neotenous head to body proportions closer to 1 to 5. All cartoons are doing the same but exaggerated. "Minor" must be scientifically grounded better than the age when male children are large enough to carry the kit of grossly immortal mass murder orgies the halfwits call war.

    Arbitrary age is irrelevant in purely visual media. Attempting to somehow mass surveil everyone to enforce it is dystopian insanity. The only solution is to be more scientifically grounded. It is ugly, and a bit ick, but whatever, those are illogical emotions fighting real justice and must be suppressed. Most countries like Germany and France have lowered their ages for minors. The only scientifically relevant ages are puberty and cognitive maturity at 25. Make it 25 and you will be supporting your kids until 25 financially, and the military will fall apart from people with the mind to question orders and think for themselves in mass.

    Edit: To be clear, I do not want people fucking kids or what not, or exploiting them. I'm against authoritarian parenting by proxy with a state making up for terrible parents, but that is another thing entirely. I do not care about this personally or in justification of anything. It is simply an observation of inevitability as data expands and ages. Images in 100 years will still be around just the same. Their categorization must be derived from the pixels themselves. There is no other long term solution. How anyone feels about that is totally irrelevant stupidity and amounts to nothing more than stupid children putting their head in the sand and saying "nuh uhh!" Science and democracy are ugly. They always have been. If you cannot handle the ugly with the good, you are a fascist or authoritarian, and to that dystopian nightmare culture, fuck you for starting a war for democracy soon. Sincerely.

  • Bedtime

    Jump
  • Who would buy a cat because it does this?

  • I have had stuff removed from there for not being casual enough. but yeah GTFO vibes are strong here, and IRL. When it rains it pours. Not a single relevant comment or positive thing added in a place called social media. Wonderful neighborhood.