You can also donate dev time or help with issue backlogs if you don't have the money. If you know what you're doing, or have something useful to contribute (even just fixing typos, doing translations, or updating documentation) that time spent can be just as valuable as a financial contribution.
I think the last one I gave money to was Kimai, and I've helped write some API tooling for several other management tools that I use.
Is just baked into Gmail and Outlook now. I can't even draft an email without it trying to "auto complete" entire paragraphs with bogus nonsense info. Which is definitely not okay when that email is about detailed design/engineering specifications.
What an interesting observation—highly relevant to the modern world—it's a shame that cultural touchstones are being devastated by these statistical abnormalities—we must delve deeper into the root causes of this—I firmly believe that we need to train a bigger AI to help determine what is AI and prevent this from—becoming an issue long—term
This would only make sense if there was like a literal gun to a person's head and a dog's head or something. Which is a ridiculous scenario that would never happen. You can be against battery farming without putting human lives at risk (in fact you'd actually save a lot of lives since battery farmed animals are responsible for antibiotic resistance and a massive vector for disease).
"I think human life is more important than the life of a non-human animal" sure, you can hold that opinion without resorting the ridiculous hyperbole. At least present a reasonable argument for that point.
Cockshott is a TERF, but Towards a New Socialism is basically a techbro pipeline. It shows how you can use what are essentially financial algorithms (based on Gosplan production matrices) to implement a planned economy.
So basically the only good use for ""AI"" models. I think this guy specifically is a good example of the beginning of that pipeline. This is one of the first times he's explicitly brought up Graeber, but his video on money was definitely influenced by him. Seems like he's not too far away from making it more explicit that his concept of automation is based on socialist theory.
Yeah, but it also makes "forking" into a more ambiguous term overall. A GitHub fork can be a clone with a working branch or an actual fork and it's not immediately obvious until you look at the code.
That's why I use the README test to see if a forked repo is an actual fork since almost no one will modify the README if their GitHub fork is actually a work branch.
Miller Highlife