I have a 70yo colleague that does open triathlons that includes swimming in the open north sea and comes in like top 10%. He does look a little wrinkly but he does move quick
It's more that stupid parents aren't going to have kids because stupid. That's how evolution selects - if an individual or more specifically, a trait isn't suitable, it or it's offspring have a very low likelihood of continuing their lineage.
Torpedos, sure but I'm impressed that the wire in fly by wire missiles can withstand the fire coming out the back. Even if placed away, they'd still be in the jet stream.
Not their first time I believe, they lost their navy before getting to who they needed to fight, whom iirc rescued them instead because they felt so sorry for them
The article discusses forfeiture of driving license as a consequence of cycling whilst drunk. My stand is that this is unreasonable, as the damage that a drunk cyclist can inflict on others or themselves is magnitudes lower than that of driving drunk.
We can discuss walking if walking whilst drunk also can lead to a forfeiture of a driving license. Because hey, a drunk person could walk into traffic just as much as a drunk cyclist could.
Given the same "price", the 'rational consumer' (of illegal activities) would choose the (seemingly) more valuable purchase (crime) - value here being time saved and convenience.
Article compares cycling and driving, so we should stock to that. Opening it up invites all manner of options like designated driver, and a all others.
I have a 70yo colleague that does open triathlons that includes swimming in the open north sea and comes in like top 10%. He does look a little wrinkly but he does move quick