Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)H
Posts
1
Comments
143
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Harm

    Jump
  • Take a look again, it's still there

  • But who guarantees that ec will overcome decoherence, introduced by this number of qbits? Not a trivial question that nobody can answer for certain

  • Harm

    Jump
  • Took me a minute to notice, but it was worth it

  • If qbits double every year

    And then we need to increase coherence time, which is 50ms for the current 433 qubits large chip. Error correction might work, but might not

  • Ok, I decided to dive into it today again and look what I've found:

    1. They still demonstrate supremacy to each other proving that their setup couldn't be simulated. These 433 and 1000 qubit processors are good only for one purpose: to simulate itself.
    2. Photonic QC still estimates hafnian billions times faster; if only this mathematical structure appeared to have any practical meaning
    3. They demonstrated that toric codes might be effective
  • 1000 qubits? Where? Last time I checked it was 50 qubits for 200ms

  • How could you flip the burgers from home, Steve?

  • I'm not as dumb as this dumb turtle suffocating in american

  • No Christmas for 5 years?? Why are you doing this to us, systemd???

  • Kinda the only way to support my family, sir

  • Ehm.. no? At very least jail mr Trump

  • Suck it up, Palestine, you'd be fucked anyway

  • Dumb? Where?

  • Buckle up, Baltic states

  • You sound very emotionally invested in this conversation, so I stop it right now. If you are still interested in the answer, please read the comment in another branch.

    Please take care and don't forget to drink water today.

  • Don't play Trump's card here. I was wrong in one argument, thank you for pointing it out, but overall it doesn't seem that the claim that "Russia is collapsing due to sanctions and war" has been damaged in any way

  • I was wrong about 18 being "for a long time". Still, if it's indeed a measure to regulate inflation, it worked previously, why wouldn't it work this time?

  • No, this is a good reality check. Still we can see how the rate has dropped from 20 to 8 like nothing