Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)H
Posts
3
Comments
280
Joined
3 yr. ago

Reddit refugee

  • Ah, my bad, I had completed missed the "8 years ago" bit in the article.

  • It's literally the fifth word...

  • This sucks, but doing a match when your vision is impaired is dumb af and puts you and the others on the match at such a greater risk.

  • Cos trains fuck, obviously.

  • Check out the work of David Hockney.

    But, please remember, you are not really alone.

  • Bob gang!

  • King. Shit.

  • Lots of windows.

  • I think the speed at which people seem to develop anthropomorphic relationships with a piece of software programmed to agree with you is the thing that scares me most about LLMs.

    Also, yknow, this is the express, so take this article with kilos of salt.

  • Prague next?

  • I can finally stream Shinobi with no guilt.

  • Noob question, how can you use it to take notes if it's headless?

  • Ah yes, we must continue to do the thing that hasn't been working. How super smort.

  • Such a patriot!

  • I completely agree with not wanting the UK to be China.

    But I do see these as separate things - the same issues you describe could be done with driving licences, if someone was mad enough to try.

  • I honestly don't get the resistance to a standard ID card.

    We already have passports, driving licences, and national insurance as work arounds to prove identity, so in and of itself I don't get why a proper one is a problem.

    I've literally had to carry a driving licence for over two decades just to get a beer.

  • Clear cut incitement of violence, time to ban his companies outright.

  • I wonder if the canary realise that they are making the same argument here as was made to not give women the vote. Namely, that a married couple will have the same views.

    Granted, I do struggle to see how anyone could be married to a lobbist - let alone for arms - but association is not proof of a view.

    Is there a risk? Sure, and it needs to be recorded as a potential conflict of interests and managed correctly - and, again, given all the other dumb shit that has happened this week I am sceptical that that has happened - but the assertion being made here is not a good look, at best, and arguably misogynistic at worst.