Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)H
Posts
8
Comments
1665
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I’m sorry, but Newsom gives me the same ick as Trump. I would consider third party if Newsom is nominated. That’s how much I don’t want him to be president, and I voted for both Biden and Harris.

  • The answer isn’t Newsom or Trump. I’d take Warren, despite her age. I’d take AOC.

  • AOC

  • He’s wrong if he’s supporting Newsom

  • That’s irresponsible. I never loaded my gun this morning. I was bringing it to the shop to try a new sight

  • Do you want a religion based on the infallible Donald Trump? Because I don’t. He won’t be alive to insult them anymore so they’ll just project what they want to believe onto him.

  • Why is arch under “don’t want to learn”? I learned a lot of what I know about Linux from using arch.

    That being said, the chart is supporting my inkling to try Nix… must be accurate

  • Ok so I said cremated for a reason. If you leave bones (aka left to rot), there are crazy people who will look for his bones because he was their idle. If you cremate him, there are no bones to find.

  • Trump doesn’t deserve a grave. He should be cremated and his ashes should be dumped into a coal power plant since he’s so passionate about that

  • That last part wasn’t really necessary.

    I was under the impression that the DOJ has the ability to confirm the existence of the photos because they have access to the safe or the contents therein.

    Maybe I should have read the article. It’s more speculative than I was led to believe from the comments lol

  • Nano

  • USCSB?

  • It is absolutely evidence, but the evidence isn’t conclusive and doesn’t prove anything by itself. If you can get someone to testify that they are in the picture and what date it is, you have a stronger case.

    At the very least, if the person in the photo is underage at that time, you can paint a pretty damning picture for the right jury. Furthermore if the person in the photo is underage and testifies to sexual conduct, you have an extremely good case because the fact that there is a picture of them together gives her immense credibility. I’m not a lawyer but I’m pretty sure sexual conduct with a minor has always been sexual assault and illegal so…

  • Do Polaroids print dates? I was thinking like old point and shoot cameras

  • You also need to establish the date the photo was taken. I didn’t read the article so I don’t know if they are analog photos with the date printed or if it’s a digital printed photo that doesn’t have the date. Either way, you need both to establish a crime as opposed to creepy but legal.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • How fucked up is it that I needed your comment to understand the comment of who you replied to? Jesus

  • As an American, your statement is an insult to assholes

  • Does Bondi, as USAG not have power over US attorneys?

  • Shut up, Cartman