Skip Navigation

Posts
4
Comments
248
Joined
8 mo. ago

  • Not OP, but I have very strong opinions on this, so Imma chime in. I'm very much on the "older Souls is better than newer Souls" side of the argument, and I think Demon's Souls has the best bosses in the entire series, hands down.

    Bosses used to be unique, and used to provide interesting challenges to the player, from their arenas to their movesets to their "gimmicks". Every boss in DeS is different, strikingly so, and they all add to their settings and make use of mechanics in interesting ways.

    Nowadays, all boss arenas are just enormous empty spaces, with nothing to impede the player, and all bosses are just rhythm games with slightly different rhythms. It's just boring.

    Demon's Souls bosses are interesting and innovative. People think that "most of the DeS bosses are gimmick bosses, with only a few real bosses", but what they don't understand is that every boss in DeS is a gimmick boss, and that's what makes them interesting. False King Allant's gimmick is that you have to learn his moveset and master the combat system, as opposed to mastering stealth in the Old Hero's fight, or solving the puzzle of how best for your build to damage the boss in the Adjudicator fight.

    Demon's Souls bosses were like their levels - experiences to be explored, to be conquered through your ingenuity and use of the tools the game provides, not just "are you good enough at DDR and min-maxing your build?" This follows the general (unfortunate, in my opinion) trend of Souls games coming to be more focused on combat instead of overcoming, because while they sound identical they're actually two very different things. Level design too has completely fallen by the wayside as combat has become the sole focus of the games' challenges for the player.

    Everyone loves Artorias (and I do too), but he was the beginning of the end for the old, slow, deliberate adventure style of Fromsoft game that I fell in love with the series for in the first place, and while I love the newer games too, there's very little out there like Dark Souls 1, and there's nothing out there like Demon's Souls.

  • I came to the series probably around the release of DS3, or slightly before. I'd heard that they were supposed to be super hard but excellent games and wanted to see what the fuss was all about.

    I got a copy of Demon's Souls from GameStop for probably like $14, but didn't start it for probably another few months to a year.

    When I finally did start it, I started as a knight and ragequit pretty early into it as many of us probably did - maybe not even past Boletaria 1-1 - and told myself that I'd never play the game again.

    A month or so later, however, the game wouldn't get out of my head. I just kept thinking, "What could I do to do better?" and before I knew it, I had started another character.

    I remember that my wife came downstairs and said "Isn't that that game you got mad at and quit playing like a month ago?" And I was like "yeah, but I think I can do better this time".

    I played as a sorcerer because that's what all of the websites said was the strongest class, and I played through the game constantly terrified. I remember that I got the Lava Bow to cheese as many regular enemies and bosses as I could, and I inched my way through the game super slowly and carefully.

    I used Flame Pillar cheese to beat Allant because I was so terrified of him.

    I moved on to Dark Souls, becoming more and more confident and aggressive the more I played. Ten-ish years later I've beaten every modern game From has made, SL1'd multiple games, and even gone back to play King's Field. As many others have said, Fromsoft has basically ruined all other video games for me save a few similar experiences like older Monster Hunter.

    Unfortunately I think the FromSoft games are also slowly losing what drew me to them in the first place, but they're still amazing games, and I always look forward to seeing what From comes out with next.

    Overall ranking for anyone interested: DeS > Sekiro > DS1 > BB > ER > DS2 > DS3

  • Do you have a source for him going off on people on set? I've looked around a bit but can't find anything.

  • I honestly don't know how much better the result would have been. I think if Jackson has free rein, he still omits the Scouring of the Shire.

    Jackson also tends toward the dramatic, like how he changed the Witch King's mace to a flail that was practically larger than the actor, or the completely unnecessary theatrics of Denethor's death.

    I don't really blame him for the Hobbit, because when someone is throwing that much money at you, it's hard to not just do the job and try to forget about it. He'd already finished the work that he wanted to do, after all.

    Jackson definitely nailed a lot of important scenes though, and you can tell that he wanted to make the trilogy, which automatically makes it far better than if it were just modern content slop like the Rings of Power.

  • From what Tolkien himself wrote about proposed adaptations, compared to Jackson's actual adaptation, on top of what Christopher Tolkien himself said about Jackson's adaptation, I'm very sure he would take offense at the idea that Sanderson was studying Tolkien and not Jackson.

  • I completely agree. I love the movies and think they're probably the best anyone could possibly have done with the property.

    Even so, Sanderson is studying Jackson here, and Tolkien would take offense at the implication that he was studying him (that is, studying Tolkien).

  • He's not taking notes from Tolkien - he's taking notes from Peter Jackson. Tolkien would be genuinely offended to have the movies attributed to him.

  • Removed

    we're so over

    Jump
  • Is there a key to who's who?

  • Oh wow, I haven't thought about this game since undergrad like 20 years ago.

  • Nah, turned out it's just nepotism as usual. The woman's husband personally knows the police chief.

  • If your husband is personally friends with the police chief, yes.

  • "Dialectal" or "non-standard" is more accurate than "grammatically incorrect", since "them there" is perfectly grammatical in those dialects.

  • Ok, you've made it completely clear by this point that you know practically nothing about dialectology and refuse to be educated (much less respond to the points I made in my comment), so I think I'm gonna just leave the conversation here.

  • And my point is that most Americans know of hockey just like most Canadians do

    Unfortunately for you, two groups of people having knowledge about the same thing does not mean that they use the same words to refer to that knowledge (see "aluminum" vs. "aluminium", or maybe more appropriately, "soccer" vs. "football"). Americans and Canadians both knowing about ice hockey does not mean that they use the same words to refer to the sport, and to assume otherwise is uninformed and wrong. Like, this is Ling 101 levels of basic.

    I expect most Americans also refer to ice hockey as hockey, and field hockey as field hockey.

    Ah the hubris that comes with unquestioned assumptions based on your own dialect.

    My wife cracked up the first time I asked her if she wanted me to "carry her to the store" (meaning "drive her"), which genuinely shocked me, because I had had zero reason up until that moment to think that idiom was unique to my own dialect area, especially when we're from roughly the same region.

    The point is, you're very clearly, demonstrably wrong about this. Based on a poll of just the four people in my household, three of them would say "ice hockey" while the other says that they would probably just say "hockey".

    One can also reference how the promoters of the leagues refer to themselves.

    One can also realize that not everyone speaks like people paid to have a career in a specific sport. Maybe asking people with literally the most possible bias for one over the other isn't the best way to go about capturing linguistic diversity.

    that likely doesn’t apply to someone who grew up in New York City

    Based on what? Your ass? Because New Yorkers famously sound just like Canadians and don't at all have a very famous, particular way of talking...

    We already have an excellent data point that this may not in fact be true. That data point? The fact that Trump, who is a New Yorker, educated in New York, as you pointed out, said "ice hockey" in fluent speech instead of saying "hockey".

    So how they refer to hockey in some region of America that hasn’t touched ice that wasn’t floating in a drink isn’t really relevant to this discussion.

    Demonstrating that there clearly exist Americans who say "ice hockey" instead of "hockey" is an excellent data point when discussing whether this is a dialect difference between some American and Canadian speakers.

    All of your assertions come, like I said, straight from your ass, and are therefore much less relevant to the discussion.

    And, of course, the main point, once again, because I think it's important:

    WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU CRITICIZING TRUMP FOR SAYING "ICE HOCKEY" INSTEAD OF, Y'KNOW, CRITICIZING HIM FOR THE HORRIBLE SHIT HE'S DOING TO CANADA??

  • The point wasn't that field hockey is a major league sport (though it is a popular recreational sport - my high school had a field hockey team but not an ice hockey team, for example).

    The point is that this is a clear dialectal difference between some speakers of American and Canadian English, and so criticizing Trump for this, of all the things you should be criticizing him for, is stupid (and ignorant)!

  • Haha, exactly

  • Trump isn't Canadian.

  • Trump isn't Canadian though?

  • I'd ask, "Ice hockey or field hockey?" because there's no way to tell until you specify.

  • Soulslike - Discussion, News, Memes @lemmy.zip

    Does anyone have video proof of successfully using Soulsucker on Garl Vinland in the original Demon's Souls?

  • Games @lemmy.world

    Gamers Nexus's 3-hour GPU smuggling documentary is finally back up after being fraudulently DMCA'd by Bloomberg. Go give them a watch to make up for some of the lost traction!

  • Technology @lemmy.world

    Gamers Nexus's 3-hour GPU smuggling documentary is finally back up after being fraudulently DMCA'd by Bloomberg. Go give them a watch to try to make up for the lost traction!

  • Linux @programming.dev

    Any way to share iPad screen over Zoom on Mint?