Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)G
Posts
0
Comments
67
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • It could be interesting to see, if us attacks cuba, maybe cuba could retake this stolen land. And leak what they find there.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Empire defenders assemble! The comment sections cannot allow dissent!

  • Only in china the peoples democracy is so confident, that it allows millitarized separatist to pretend they are government of an island which they invaded and settled.

  • Totally unprovoked act of agression? Where can I see this phrase, I didnt find it yet in the mainstream. Well I hope ICJ will issue arrest warrant for Trump any day now.

  • tell me more zionazi

  • Yeah no. While the jews figure is commonly cited the 2mill other is from where? Especially slavs??

    if we are outside of germany also well then the proportion is even lower, so whats your point? And the complete tolls were not even the argument, thats as i said a strawman you picked. Obviously the numbers of total deaths were higher in ww2.

    But again the proportions tell a different story.

  • You didnt. Both numbers are way too low you bloody moron.

  • Well i think initial plan for jews of hitler was to deport them to madagascar, where they could have a state. As for netanyahu he used to posture that yes he would allow palestinians some form of a state, but likely there was never such idea in his plans for future.

    As for the scale, can we get some numbers here? I thibk that the jewish population of germany was lower in proportion than that of the palestinians in the occupied palestine.

  • Both of the numbers are absurdly wrong, i mean incorrect. And the comparison is obviously not based on death toll. Thats a strawman you picked. Your entire comment is just absurd.

  • Why not just bring palestinian flags etc to it.

  • Thats a lie. Thats confirmed cases. Lets not misrepresent. The highest estimates like used to be the Lancet one, has largest portion in the collateral deaths, meaning large part of the hunger related ones.

    Also kids are very vulnerable to this since mothers stop lactating thanks to the genocider blocking food.

    completely true last point, because israel doesnt care about any inch of international law the ghf can essentially shoot at aid seekers and call that aid. The un agencies have plead for the standard food shipments to be restored to them. But israel demands they use the routes with the armed gangs and israeli protesters of nonstarvation.

  • In europe we are always unsure about genocide being good or bad.

  • Dead or probably dead is obviously an estimate. The part of probably dead counters your second argument. I think that since this is from thr direct death toll number its a vast undercount, since for example hunger related deaths will be civilian. I dont understand why do you think 83% or less? it seems to me you didnt read the article sinc the 17 to 83 from guardian was mentioned.

    Of course the numbers are incomplete, these are just one of the best we have. Even the article here cites idf number as grounds for argument of 2 to 8 militanto to civilian ratio. The reason why hamas doesnt publish it is just part of guerrila warfare. The israeli enemy would gain valuable intel that way. So the hamas published numbers would be seen as unreliable, as many commentators argued even about their complete death toll number. But now you say that those numbers are good?

  • Well as we now know inner idf documents had estimate of 84% of all deaths being civilian.

  • Again no bernie quote. So the strawman is long forgotten. It seems to me youre not able to defend single point you made. Do you think i mind the word "tankie"? You can call me a "RED" for all i care.

  • Again no bernie quote. So you just abandoned the strawman? It seems to me you were indeed crying. Also you only talked about some mythical side of human rights. Idk now you are describing which state the US? I mean we are directly supporting it and funding it. "enabling" is a bit of a whitewash.

    I dont think that we have any highground on china in this case. Maybe yemen does, idk if iran, but we sure dont.

  • Yes you were crying about which mythical side of human rights china is on in your view. Irrelevant to the gaza genocide. Although in regards to cpc position on plight of palestinians, they sure seem to value human rights more than we do.

    Nice quote, do i even respond to such a strawman? You also failed to adress all the other points, like for example bernie not being a zio