Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)F
Posts
4
Comments
1208
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Nah. If it's a choice between GrapheneOS on a pixel or an iPhone I'd take my chances with the pixel.

    It would be pretty easy to detect if there was unexpected traffic with any google services.

    You do you but IMO Graphene is your best chance in 2025.

  • On a phone ?

  • I'm not sure if displaying a swastika is banned, if it is I wasn't aware of that.

    Most states banned the salute. The federal govt recently banned it too, with mandatory incarceration.

  • What's the alternative?

  • Yeah look i wouldn't sign up for this on principle because subscriptions are shit, but I do enjoy poncy overpriced water.

    I don't drink booze, smoke, or do drugs. I have a very restrictive diet and can't even have a slice of cake once in a while.

    You'll have to pry my lightly sparkling imported Italian mineral water from my cold dead hands.

  • I don't really understand lemmy's derision for this opinion.

    It's the obvious outcome. Luigi might be a hero but he's going to jail.

  • If only there were some way you could kind of refer viewers to the primary documentation for the project.

  • I'm sure that this seems obvious to you, but it's not clear to me... are you saying that human to human transmission isn't worth worrying about, even if the virus mutated to be more infectious between humans?

    Having a quick read, it seems like infections in humans range from unnoticeable to very severe, so I guess it's going to be a question of the ratio between severe and mild cases, which is unknown level given that we would need a mutation before it became relevant.

    Did I just answer my own question?

    In any case, this threat to your dairy must be very stressful. Good luck!

  • It's not that it's uncommon, but slightly different for each project.

    I collated library would be kinda cool.

    That said, I don't know how much utility this project would have.

  • Settle down mate.

    I didn't say defaced websites are going to take down the government.

    My implication was that it would be more effective than ranting on social media.

  • that is what I would do

    No you wouldn't.

  • It's not about money and humanity though.

    It's about punishing "other" people.

  • Yeah. I've only spent a few moments skimming through the linked article but if you were part of a legitimate hacktivism group planning a significant operation why would you publish this statement ?

    It's really just spooky hyperbole - as though written by an adolescent that want's to sound scary and powerful.

    I would absolutely love to see hacktivists cause some chaos, and maybe even some real financial harm.

  • I'm not going to write off hacktivism so quickly.

    Even if it's just a few defaced websites now and then, that's a whole lot more effective than any other sort of activism I've seen to date.

  • you ‘equally’ refuse to allow the punishment of defendant by returning a ‘not guilty’ verdict

    That's not what equally means. The same law needs to be applied to everyone. Making exceptions creates inequality.

    Luigi was acting in self defense

    If that is Luigi's legal defense then the jury needs to weigh the evidence of that claim and if supported of course they would return a not-guilty verdict. That's not jury nullification.

    ‘not guilty’, regardless of the letter of the law.

    This is, quite obviously, a corruption of the legal process. If jury nullification is an intended feature of the legal process then why aren't jurors instructed to find the defendant guilty, not-guilty, or exempt? Why don't defense attorneys tell jury's that the application of the law in this case is unjust and therefore they should find the defendant not guilty?

    Your fixation with DeSiGnInG RoBuSt sYsTeMs is absurd. It doesn't support your position in any way. I could just as well say that you obviously don't have a job that requires much thought or requires you to consider complex problems with unquantifiable ethical aspects.

    You thinking about this for a long time also does not support your position in any way. People can believe in all sorts of nonsense their entire lives. The inflexibility and inability to support your position is a pretty good indicator that you haven't really thought about this but merely like how the concept feels.

  • Historically authoritarians tend not to return control to democratic processes. That is to say, you become the threat you're trying to avoid.

  • Crushing fascism is authoritarian if you need to become authoritarian to do it.

  • Settle down pet. Of course I know what I meant but I'm concerned that you do not.

  • I'm not complaining about it. I just thought it was an odd statement. I couldn't care less about .world