Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E
Posts
0
Comments
293
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • One big one is that today's parents put too much pressure on themselves (both individually and as a group) to always be supervising. Some parents don't feel that they can leave their child alone for 30 minutes while they shower or clean, or watch TV, because we've built up expectations that everything is structured and that we're supposed to sacrifice our individuality for the kid. Some recent research has shown that millennial parents are spending a lot more "hands on" time with their kids than any previous generation, rather than passive supervision like when kids are playing in the house while the adults do something else.

    Plus there is a significant line of people who feel compelled to do high effort, high visibility shows of parenting effort: Instagram worthy birthday parties, more structured play and learning, high effort cooking of things from scratch rather than convenience foods, etc.

    Finances (and working hours) are definitely a big part of it, but a bigger part is the shift in norms and expectations that we're expected to be much more for our kids than prior generations.

  • I assure you, many of us were drinking copious amounts of coffee before kids, too.

  • (man puts stick in own bicycle meme)

  • The vast majority of full service restaurant transactions are by card. Something like 80% of restaurant transactions are by card, and full service restaurants with servers are even higher.

    There's not a ton of cash tips at this point, so underreporting cash tips doesn't make as big of a difference as it used to.

  • Isn't that just what Lemmy shitposts is?

  • I don't think most people consider dates to be the same as dressing up for work. One can look "nice" without having to look like a white collar drone in a boring workplace.

    For example, I have different suits and ties for the workplace (conservative, standard dark colors) versus for things like weddings (brighter, more expressive colors and patterns and fabrics).

    But even short of that level of formality, there are fashion choices that can attract attention. If you're in an environment where the dress code is to wear a collar and some buttons, there's a difference between a plain polo (whether cotton or some kind of performance polyester athleisure) or a short sleeve buttoned shirt with some fun prints (whether we're talking about Dan Flashes or a Hawaiian shirt or something more subtle), on top of the decision on whether to wear that shirt tight or loose or baggy.

    Or, some people make conscious choices for their athletic wear, when they're going to the gym or for a run or a bike ride, or playing sports like golf or basketball or tennis.

    For people who are going on dates, the attire can convey a message, either intentional or not. And people might choose to send completely different messages in the workplace versus on dates versus just out with friends.

  • Like rehearsing a speech in the mirror while getting ready for the day.

  • living DNA along with better error correction mechanisms so it doesn't mutate

    Isn't DNA, like, famous for its mutations?

  • By my count that's:

    16g carbs (64 calories)45g fat (405 calories)56g protein (224 calories)14g alcohol (100 calories)

    That's about 800 calories per day, with enough protein to maintain at least some lean mass while on a significant calorie deficit.

    Doesn't seem healthy but I think it would work.

  • That's literally what the headline is. "Deadnaming" is a term for referring to transgender people by their previous names, rather than their current names.

  • Why the focus on white people? What are non-black, non-white people supposed to take away from this?

    And if we're just picking up language from others around us, we can acknowledge that pretty much every word, every phrase, every syntactical or grammatical construct we use, we learned by observing others. And we don't always have the ability to specifically attribute sources for where we learned what, so trying to gatekeep who can and can't use particular phrases or words is going to be prone to errors. And ultimately futile.

    thinking they are entitled to everything

    This is a FOSS-focused community. The core idea here is that publishing and sharing ideas releases it out to the world, where the creator no longer controls who may use it, or how they may use it.

    That's why your position on who can or can't use certain types of language seems so foreign. It's directly contradicting some of the core values that this community is organized around.

  • Linguists dropped the "Vernacular" because it is not a slang language

    Since when does "vernacular" apply only to slang? It's just everyday language, which can include slang but includes plenty of non-slang.

  • I don't walk as much as you, but if someone was paying me 25 cents per step I'd probably respond to that incentive by walking way more than 10 miles a day.

  • I'm giving 1-star ratings to weather apps because it's too cold outside.

  • Oh this line of comments was serious? I thought we were making jokes.

  • I'm just trying to extrapolate to being supportive of government surveillance, and proving that other commenter right.

  • If they go and follow 200 users on 20 different instances, then they'll most likely get followed back by someone on 90% of those instances. It's not that much effort.

    I don't know, this sounds like an unnatural way to interact with a service. Following 4000 accounts and trying to spread it out evenly between servers sounds like a terrible way to curate one's own feed and consume content on a service like this. I rarely follow more than 100 on any given service, and think it's weird when people follow more than 500.

    Following back seems like a pretty foreign concept to me on this type of service, and seems to me to be inconsistent with how people actually use Twitter or Bluesky. To me, these hiccups in user experience as either a lurker (can't find anyone in-band who another person on your instance doesn't already follow) or publisher (can't be found easily from anyone off of your server unless you actively go try to spam follows in the hopes that some will follow back) would be a dealbreaker for anything less than the biggest server.

  • But do the naked gay men have an exhibition fetish, especially by government agents?

  • So if you set up on small server A, and want to be discoverable by users on server B, C, D, and E, you have to do this for many different users and hope that they follow you back just so that those servers' users can find you.

    And it basically defeats the main use case for where I actually understand microblogging, which is one-way announcements by semi-automated accounts that are widely followed that do not actually follow anyone else back.

    It just sounds like a bad arrangement for discoverability and search.

    hashtags are big on Mastodon

    But I can't view the posts of any users by hashtag if those users aren't already being followed by someone from my server, right? That means I'd never want to join a small server if I'm just a lurker who doesn't really want to actively interact with others, because my own feed would be limited.

    there's no algorithm

    Sounds like an algorithm that's just more complicated and has unintuitive human inputs in it.