Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E

Even_Adder

@ Even_Adder @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts
58
Comments
423
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • So you don't interact with AI stuff outside of that? Have you seen any cool research papers or messed with any local models recently? Getting a bit of experience with the stuff can help you better inform people and see through the more bogus headlines.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • It definitely seems that way depending on what media you choose to consume. You should try to balance the doomer scroll with actual research and open source news.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Ok, but is training an AI so it can plagiarize, often verbatim or with extreme visual accuracy, fair use? I see the 2 first articles argue that it is, but they don’t mention the many cases where the crawlers and scrappers ignored rules set up to tell them to piss off. That would certainly invalidate several cases of fair use

    You can plagiarize with a computer with copy & paste too. That doesn't change the fact that computers have legitimate non-infringing use cases.

    Instead of charging for everything they scrap, law should force them to release all their data and training sets for free.

    I agree

    I’d wager 99.9% of the art and content created by AI could go straight to the trashcan and nobody would miss it. Comparing AI to the internet is like comparing writing to doing drugs.

    But 99.9% of the internet is stuff that no one would miss. Things don't have to have value to you to be worth having around. That trash could serve as inspiration for your 0.1% of people or garner feedback for people to improve.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • But the law is largely the reverse. It only denies use of copyright works in certain ways. Using things "without permission" forms the bedrock on which artistic expression and free speech are built upon.

    AI training isn’t only for mega-corporations. Setting up barriers like these only benefit the ultra-wealthy and will end with corporations gaining a monopoly of a public technology by making it prohibitively expensive and cumbersome for regular folks. What the people writing this article want would mean the end of open access to competitive, corporate-independent tools and would jeopardize research, reviews, reverse engineering, and even indexing information. They want you to believe that analyzing things without permission somehow goes against copyright, when in reality, fair use is a part of copyright law, and the reason our discourse isn’t wholly controlled by mega-corporations and the rich.

    I recommend reading this article by Kit Walsh, and this one by Tory Noble staff attorneys at the EFF, this one by Katherine Klosek, the director of information policy and federal relations at the Association of Research Libraries, and these two by Cory Doctorow.

  • [DISC] THE ISEKAI DOCTOR Any sufficiently advanced medical science is indistinguishable from magic. - Ch. 39

    Jump

  • Didn't this get taken down off Mangadex in the last crusade?

  • Looking for recommendations

    Jump

  • YSK: Regulations don't exist because governments like them...

    Jump

  • Aluminum sulfate in the bread, anti-freeze in the wine, and chalk in the milk.

  • YSK: Regulations don't exist because governments like them...

    Jump

  • Pure unadulterated capitalism means adulterated bread, wine, and milk.

  • Lazarus - Episode 3 discussion

    Jump

  • I was thinking that was their man.

  • insane

    Jump

  • Now do "Speed Weed".

  • Backstabbed in a Backwater Dungeon: My Party Tried to Kill Me, But Thanks to an Infinite Gacha I Got LVL 9999 Friends and Am Out for Revenge | Key Visual

    Jump

  • Start writing this. You'll be rich.

  • “It Wouldn’t Be Surprising If, in Two Years’ Time, There Was a Film Made Completely Through AI”: Says Hayao Miyazaki’s Own Son

    Jump

  • Is Miyazaki going to go in on his son again?

  • Twins Hinahima

    Jump

  • It's impressive what they were able to do with three year old tools and workflows. The whole thing came together into something oddly cohesive looking, though pretty wobbly.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Fuck 'em. I don't care. I hope no one uses them.

  • Spring Anime Season Preview Discussion and Thread Requests [2025, Week 13]

    Jump

  • Right. I all I can find are "parody" subs, which aren't actually that bad.

  • Spring Anime Season Preview Discussion and Thread Requests [2025, Week 13]

    Jump

  • It doesn't seem like anything outside of MBS television in Japan has been announced. I guess we'll find out when it's closer to dropping.

  • Now you’ve done it.

    Jump

  • He and I had this talk two years ago.

  • Solo Leveling Season 2 -Arise from the Shadow- • Ore dake Level Up na Ken: Season 2 - Arise from the Shadow - Episode 13 discussion

    Jump

  • Beru got speech to glaze Sung Jinwoo.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I'm not discussing the use of private data, nor was I ever. You're presenting a false Dichotomy and trying to drag me into a completely unrelated discussion.

    As for your other point. The difference between this and licensing for music samples is that the threshold for abuse is much, much lower. We're not talking about hindering just expressive entertainment works. Research, reviews, reverse engineering, and even indexing information would be up in the air. This article by Tori Noble a Staff Attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation should explain it better than I can.