Skip Navigation

Posts
3
Comments
612
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • That's why I don't use flatpaks, either they're not accelerated, or they can't use external libs already installed, or they can't print etc etc. Sure, that's all fixable if the devs were doing a good job on flatpaking, but they don't, as it's quite complex. So we end up with apps that have a reduced featured set. I personally prefer appimages, even if they're a pain to update manually (from official sources always). I have about 10-15 such apps that I update them once a month manually. Everything else is from the official repo.

  • You might want to look at this one to sync your home folder: https://freefilesync.org/vision.php and then use ssh for system updates. There are no OSes that do this kind of synchronization except maybe NixOS.

  • Requires X11, doesn't work well on wayland.

  • Start with Mint, it's the one that probably you'd be happier with if you're a new user.

  • I bought a d-link usb wifi for $7. It worked fine on Linux.

  • Try a newer distro, in case the bluetooth stack on Mint from 2024 is too old. Maybe the latest ubuntu, and see if that works (try the live cd, no need to install). If not, try Fedora, which is different enough to possibly implement things a bit differently. If that doesn't work either, you're probably out of luck. The asha protocol has bugs on linux. Basically, Linux is great for common hardware, not so good for uncommon one.

  • I've installed that, doesn't really make a difference. I'm not interested in skin deep changes, but in how the program works mostly internally.

  • I'm missing the ability to adding shadows, and to change each color individually in HSL, as in the Secondary color tool in PS. Gimp 3 manages that stuff better. Not 100%, but it works fine enough for my needs. I have more trouble with Krita on these features. So for me, Krita is not the answer to edit my traditional painting scans.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I've used Linux since 1998 (red hat), along BeOS. But I went back to Windows because XP was rather good, Linux was becoming good too slowly, and BeOS was dead. Still kept my Linux partitions though, while my laptop was now running MacOSX. After a few years, with 7, Windows became even better, so I moved to it full time, including in laptops. In the 2010s I tried Linux a couple of times again, but it was having these small bug things that was breaking the overall good experience. It just wasn't ready for the desktop, sorry. My laptops became once again MacOSX, while I was doing photoshop cleanup for my traditional paintings with Windows 10. Then, in 2022, I retried Linux, and it was finally ready for how I always wanted it to be. The overall experience was good. Linux came to 100% usability for me just this year, with the release of Gimp 3, which allowed adjustment layers.

    Basically, I have a baseline standard of how well I expect OSes to work on the desktop. I want the number of bad surprises to a minimum. I'm too old for tinkering, I want things to work. For Linux, this came true only in the last few years. So now I'm switched to it on all my computers. I only kept one macbook air with macos, all the other older mac intel ones are now running linux too. My main OS is Debian-Testing, while on laptops I run Mint. I have no Windows PC anymore at all.

  • I have 4 Apple laptops running Linux, so I have some experience with it all.

    The Macbook Air 2011 has wifi driver bugs, on large downloads/updates you will experience crashes (complete lockups). This happens with either of the two drivers available for it (foss linux and broadcomm). I suggest you get a tiny usb wifi for it for $6. You blacklist the internal driver first.

    For the 2008 macbook, consider if it has 4 gb of ram or not. If yes, use linux, if not, have it as a toy. Maybe install something Q4OS (with trinity DE), or even Haiku. I personally don't use Linux on less than 4 GB of RAM. Yes, it loads fine on lite distros, but the moment you want to do some web browsing, you'll hit the swap, which destroys the drive. 4 GB RAM is my minimum. Also, the fact that it doesn't have EFI, it will work best with Q4OS (which is Debian based), and Haiku.

    For the 2013 one, I'd suggest Linux Mint, it works great. You might, or might not require a usb wifi too. On some newer macbooks the wifi works without crashes during usage, but it doesn't let the machine wake up properly you see. So all that stuff need to be tested by you.

    On the 2015+ macbooks, the webcam doesn't work usually (the third party driver doesn't work properly either).

  • I never had problems, particularly with a popular package like Chromium, and I'm even using Debian-Testing, which is supposed to be unstable. You're definitely fiddling enough with your system to get Debian to get into DLL hell.

  • I personally use an extension to have the top bar hide when i maximize an app. I can't stand the wasted space either.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • You can install anything you want via their flatpak app, which is pre-setup (unlike ubuntustudio that does come with media apps, but doesn't have an easy way to get flatpaks going -- it only has snaps).

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • The biggest advantage of ubuntu studio is their special pipewire setup, included in a package called ubuntustudio-pipewire-something. This can be installed by any distro that uses Ubuntu's repositories, e.g. Mint, Zorin etc. As for the apps included, they're easily installed manually. So you can go with Mint for a first distro.

  • I own 3 Macbook Airs, running Linux. The solution was simple: buy a $6 TP-Link wifi usb stick, which is tiny, and it solved all my problems (same for BT). I used to have crashing problems with the linux AND the official broadcomm wifi driver, or the laptop wouldn't wake up from sleep etc. I just blacklisted all that, and I use the tp-link one. Sure, it eats away 1 usb port, but it's no biggie. No more crashes, or not waking up properly.

  • You misunderstood my comment. I NEVER said that the old Trek was subtle. Your whole reply is hinging on that point, which is not true. I said that they made the focus of an episode to EXPLORE ethical issues, while on new trek, they take them for granted and then they go on to have a formal adventure.

  • As both a trekie and a leftie, I must say that the conservatives who complain about modern Trek are not 100% wrong. Yes, Trek was always about social justice, but the episodes were about exploring why something was right or ethical. The new Trek takes this for granted, while half the population is not in agreement, or in a state of confusion. Instead of showing WHY something is good and just and explore it within an episode, they just present it as fact, and then they go off to some random adventure. This rubs off badly half the population. Yes, you can go all out and say that it's the conservatives' fault, and it is, but the reality is, the delivery HAS changed. New trek is not the same as old trek.

    The Orville was a much more old trek-style show, and people universally loved it more than the new trek, despite being progressive.

  • Top reads available memory more correctly than htop imho.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump