Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E

Ekky

@ ekky @sopuli.xyz

Posts
1
Comments
172
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • BuyFromEU now on Lemmy

    Jump

  • I'd keep it. People can subscribe to both, and I often find myself looking for goods in EU stores (aka. not UK, sadly) so I don't have to pay ~30€ handling fee + tax. I know that OSS exists, but it's rarely apparent whether any given online store uses it.

  • BuyFromEU now on Lemmy

    Jump

  • what’s a pun in your language, the english translation, and do you think it makes sense in english or has an english equivalent?

    Jump

  • Or slightly different:

    Får får får? Får får ej får, for får får lam.

  • Efter års tovtrækkeri: End-to-end kryptering er fredet for chatkontrol indtil videre

    Jump

  • Selvom det ikke er helt vedtaget endnu, så er det dejligt at der potentielt endelig eksisterer en måde at få anti-encryption control-freaks'ene til at holde kæft om CSAM argumentet mod sikkerhed og privatliv.

    De skal sikkert finde på andre undskyldninger til, hvorfor sikkerhed og privatlivsfred skal afskaffes, men med lidt held vil de ikke længere misbruge vore børn til det formål. Og måske vil vi endda endeligt kunne frigøre nogle resourcer til rent faktisk at gå efter misbrugerne, og ikke den almindelige borger.

    :(

  • Efter års tovtrækkeri: End-to-end kryptering er fredet for chatkontrol indtil videre

    Jump

  • Polen er nu kommet med et nyt CSAM-forslag, der skal gøre det frivilligt om udbydere vil screene beskeder for børnemisbrugsmateriale.

    Skal kampen for bedre at sikre børn mod deling af misbrugsmateriale veje højere end den almene befolknings ret til privatliv?

    Det bliver lige nu diskuteret i EU. Her har et mindretal af lande i længere tid blokeret for et forslag, hvor chattjenester bliver pålagt at screene beskeder for såkaldt CSAM-materiale.

    Efter to et halvt år med tovtrækkeri har Polen, der har EU-formandskabet i øjeblikket, fremsat et nyt revurderet forslag med fokus på frivillighed.

    Ved det seneste rådsmøde i december 2024 var blandt andet Polen selv imod forslaget. Beslutter de sig for at godkende, og alle andre beholder deres nuværende position, vil forslaget gå videre i processen.

    Den polske version

    I det nye forslag fra det polske EU-formandskab er end-to-end blevet undtaget, hvilket betyder, at brugere kan sende beskeder i fred.

    Dette er Jesper Lund, formand for IT-Politisk Forening, tilfreds med.

    Han er en af underskriverne bag et brev til justitsministeren, der understreger, at den masseovervågning, CSAM lægger op til, er ude af proportioner og underminerer befolkningens ret til privatliv.

    Det Dataetiske Råd har tidligere problematiseret, at EU ville screene alle borgeres private beskeder. Formand for Det Dataetiske Råd, Johan Busse, fortæller til Radar, at man er tilfreds med, at det nye forsalg ikke inkluderer end-to-end krypteringer.

    Polen har selv oplevet, hvordan brydning af krypterede tekster kan ramme landet hårdt. Det skete, da det tidligere regeringsparti PIS brugte hacker-softwaren Pegasus til at bryde ind i højesteretsdommeres og oppositionsmedlemmer kommunikation. Og Sovjet-fortiden spøger desuden også i baggrunden.

    Udover udelukkelsen af de krypterede beskeder lægger Polen vægt på, at det skal være en frivillig samarbejdsordning mellem EU og beskedtjenesterne, hvor det tidligere har været påkrævet, at de skulle indføre screeningen. Mød en af verdens førende bioteknologer: Vi skal blive meget bedre til at udnytte affald og sidestrømme

    Da Polen modsagde det tidligere forslag, lagde de også vægt på, at man tidligere havde oplevet på tæt hold, hvad det betyder, hvis krypteringer brydes.

    Bagmænd skal ikke kunne gemme sig bag kryptering

    CSAM er blevet diskuteret på både europæisk og nationalt plan, efter at tidligere kommissær for indenrigsanliggender, Ylva Johansson, gik i kamp mod børnemisbrugsmateriale og grooming i 2022 med CSAM-fordringen.

    Som en del af CSAM blev det foreslået at indføre såkaldt chatkontrol, der skulle pålægge beskedtjenester og teleudbydere at scanne for misbrugsmateriale som et centralt våben mod bagmændene.

    Men da flere nationer mente, at chatkontrollen brød mod centrale privatlivsrettigheder, stemte de imod forslaget.

    Især at forslaget lagde op til, at end-to-end-krypterede beskeder også skulle screenes, faldt mange for brystet.

    Dette er blevet gjort op med i det nye forslag, og det skal diskuteres i Det Europæiske Råd i midten af juni i år. Stemmes det igennem, skal det videre til trilogforhandlingerne mellem Rådet, Parlamentet og Kommissionen.

  • Freed At Last From Patents, Does Anyone Still Care About MP3?

    Jump

  • There's a reason I don't use Spotify. Well, there are multiple reasons I don't use Spotify, but one of them is because I live in an area where stable cell tower connections aren't a given.

  • Developers: "Yes, the users love cluttered homes, just put everything there and ignore guidelines"

    Jump

  • I'm a little confused by that statement. Where should locally installed (non-sudo) applications, such as virtual python envs who are accessed by multiple other not-necessarily-python apps or perhaps baloo, flatpak, etc, store their shared data? I'm rather convinced that giving all users write access to /usr/share is a terrible idea.

  • Developers: "Yes, the users love cluttered homes, just put everything there and ignore guidelines"

    Jump

  • That's respectable! But yeah, the FHS is something that's surprisingly hard to find in-depth information about if you don't already know about it.

    I think this page from systemd (or this page from the arch wiki, if you prefer formatting) has a decent description of not only the FHS, but also the more standard user/home structures.

  • Developers: "Yes, the users love cluttered homes, just put everything there and ignore guidelines"

    Jump

  • I realize that the OP is a Windows case, but I'd be rich if I had a penny for every time a savegame or config file is stored somewhere totally whack.

  • Deleted

    Nobody hates working together with leftists more than other leftists

    Jump

  • I guess I should thank you for demonstrating how I'm twisting your words by doing the same?

    "Is a woman’s unfertilized egg a baby?" <- That's a trap? Of course a woman's unfertilized is not a baby, nor is a fertilized one until born, since that would usually be defined as "embryo" or "fetus" (if being all pedantic). Though, a woman's unfertilized egg is an "animal product", as is a slice of meat.

    Now, I've chosen to use "meat" as a synonym, or over-category, for "animal products". I realize that this generalization might be important for some, so let me apologize for this apparently vital oversight, I'll try to cut it out in cardboard from now on.

    Regarding your statement about morals, as I've stated before, the hyperbole would be meaningless if the creator (of the hyperbole) wouldn't find any truth or parallel in it.

    I've read your statement as "No vegan would ever say: You're eating meat animal products, but that's all OK!", just a whole lot more demeaning and in perfect spirit of the original post.

    And once again, to really cut it out and prevent these misunderstandings of mine, I read your statement as "Vegans will not morally lower themselves to omni standards (edit: /Ethics)".

    If this was not the intention behind your words, then I will gladly stand corrected.

  • Deleted

    Nobody hates working together with leftists more than other leftists

    Jump

  • That would have been the first statement: "Vegan here, bottom left is a very small but sometimes very loud minority."

    That second statement (about the religious killings) was specifically for why finding compromise is not possible for regular vegans. Even if it was a hyperbole, it would be meaningless if not sincere.

  • Deleted

    Nobody hates working together with leftists more than other leftists

    Jump

  • "Are eggs meat?" - Yes, that's what I'm saying, I'm not sure how it can be understood any other way.

    Though, how can calling somebody a murderous cultist not be considered the least bit demeaning, whereas saying their family should starve is? As per "You wouldn’t say „... I do respect your religious tradition of human sacrifice“" having similar aggressive or demeaning meaning as "I don’t care if your family starves".

  • Deleted

    Nobody hates working together with leftists more than other leftists

    Jump

  • My point exactly! I don't see where the discrepancy lies.

    Maybe that calling someone a murderous cultist is not the same as saying their family should rather starve?

  • Deleted

    Nobody hates working together with leftists more than other leftists

    Jump

  • "I don't care if your family starves, eating eggs is literally murder!" - How can this not be represented as "Eating meat is murder!"?

  • Deleted

    Nobody hates working together with leftists more than other leftists

    Jump

  • Isn't it a little weird to call vegans who say eating meat is murder a "loud minority", and then explaining why you cannot be a vegan without saying that eating meat is murder (hyperbole or not)?

    Is there something in your comment I'm missing, or is this supposed to be some self-aware joke?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • We only had fire drills, where we had to casually follow our teacher outside, stand at the collection spot for ~10min, and then go back in and continue the lesson.

    Besides the two times where the canteen burnt the lunch so bad the alarms went off, we once had a suspected bomb alarm during uni where we were told to stay away for a few days while investigations were on, the ones who didn't need any of the instruments anyway. Turns out it was some depressed tween who made joke on reddit or tumblr about wanting to bomb the place.

    Good times.

  • Hulu quizzing about the ads played

    Jump

  • Paying for the unique opportunity to see the newest, moistest, and most intrusive ads*.

    Also comes with a limited selection of movies and series.

  • What is the legitimate use-case for generative AI?

    Jump

  • Thank you for the correction.

  • What is the legitimate use-case for generative AI?

    Jump

  • I think genAI would be pretty neat for bit banging tests fuzzing, aka. Throwing semi-random requests and/or signals at some device in the hopes of finding obscure edge-cases or security holes.