But that would also mean "you can do x at the cost of y". Ambiguous consequences here mean that they could impose a cost that would be too great when doing mental risk/reward calculation.
I think "allies" also share a responsibility in speaking up. Trans people should not be alone out there.
If it is difficult to speak to right wingers about this, recruiting and coaching others for discussion on their behalf might be an easier route and potentially more fruitful.
I'm sorry you are already so defeated about our chances. Why don't you just stand aside and collect yourself rather than try to demoralize the rest of us?
My guess is that nukes represent more acceleration towards its downfall. Anybody using nukes is going to prompt a reaction and this will promote even more rapid destruction.
I can sort of see that the corner of the frames is a little far from his face, but the arm of the glasses is still flush with his ear and the side of his face. I still don't believe that the snail is on top of his frames because there isn't a gap or enough volume to show it. His frames disappear at the nose bridge.
There is a codependency between urban and rural areas that mean that one would not work as well without the other, so I hope we can all learn to be accepting of one another.
Urban centralization creates a lot of economic demand with high populations and benefits from efficiencies of scale, but has a higher cost to use land.
Rural areas are lower cost, and the expansive areas have lots of natural resources that can be extracted or be used to farm.
Economically, people may be pushed out of cities either because of the basic cost or cost of the area that people want for themselves, so I think it makes sense why they would grow to resent the cities, disregarding cultural differences.
I see you reacting to that perceived hostility as a second or third order effect, but all that does it create a deeper problem.
Have you heard about the protests and impediments to ICE arrests that have been going on, especially in California? There was also the ambush with fireworks and gunfire by a group on the detention center in Texas. I would say that's a bit of resistance. Obviously not enough to stop the raids from happening on a wider scale, but the agency may have been slowed by it.
Dismissing the article as not being "news" is exactly the same sentiment as the news being "obvious".
It's not new information to you, but you are just speaking for yourself. Rather than holding back to avoid annoying people like you, I'd rather things be shared freely to inform the masses.
But that would also mean "you can do x at the cost of y". Ambiguous consequences here mean that they could impose a cost that would be too great when doing mental risk/reward calculation.