This was T-Mobile 5G internet, and they only had one modem available. I never bothered looking for my own 5G modem (assuming T-Mobile would even allow BYOD), because my son was already complaining about his ping. And even then, they would still only assign a single IPv6 instead of the full /64 prefix I get with my current provider.
I've seen fiber for that price, but my house is like 3 miles away from the nearest fiber location (I have a co-worker that lives within that boundary).
That is a very common reply when someone loses a loved one from a natural disaster or disease. Your child didn't die from cancer just to teach you a lesson, it was just an unfortunate tragedy (I will admit that sometimes that cancer was because of some evil, polluting, asshole corporation).
I pay $140/mo for ~300 down / 100 up. I found another provider with similar bandwidth for $50/mo, but I self-host a couple things, and they wouldn't assign me an IPv6 prefix or allow port forwarding. Also, my son complained because his games had 70 ms ping on the less expensive provider.
Edit: I'm in a big city, I think it's even worse in rural areas.
Bleh, you're right, they did provide the infraction, even though it was BS (it was cloudy, but it was not raining). I still think the excessive force gives him a pretty decent chance at winning.
I suppose I was making a more general argument that may or may not apply to this case. I am just uncomfortable telling people "just comply, or you'll make things worse," even if pragmatically that might be true.
Yeah, I saw that after I replied. That doesn't change the fact that ID is only required if the stop itself is lawful. Officers can't just pull anyone over because they "feel like it," otherwise the traffic stop itself is unlawful.
Obviously he would have had a much better time if he complied, but that's a pragmatic solution, not a legally required one. Unless the officers can show to a court what offense warranted the traffic stop in the first place, failure to identify is not by itself an offense.
Also, the video didn't appear to be making a sovereign citizen argument, just asking why he was pulled over. Pulling someone over simply for driving while black is not a lawful stop. But like you said, there are 6 more minutes of video, so we have no idea the details of this specific case, but that doesn't mean it's lawful for every case.
I'm fully aware of that entire genre of videos from sovereign citizens. /r/amibeingdetained was one of my favorite subreddits before leaving reddit.
He was within his rights to ask what law he violated before complying. The cops mentioned he needed his headlights on for the conditions, but he was skeptical, so he asked for the statute or a supervisor. If he refused after that, fine; but the cops escalated way earlier and with more force than was reasonable.
Unfortunately, the article doesn't really compare to other collectors. My wife's bookshelves are full of a much higher cost library than my Steam library could ever hope to achieve, and many of them are still on her "TBR" list. She'll also never read those physical copies, so she's buying them twice so she can read them on her Kindle or listen on Audible.
Oh man, I had almost forgotten about when you had to write different ways to read the XHR response depending on which browser you were trying to support.
I think I'm a—LLM now.