Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)D
Posts
0
Comments
212
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Well the population itself is not even 1/100th 'at capacity' in the US. The distribution of the population is certainly a cause for concern, and infrastructure is sorely in need of upgrade, but those are management problems. These are arguably exacerbated by the the fear of 'who' the increased infrastructure would be for, but it is in no way driven by lack of resources or space. We have huge swathes of crop land subsidized into non-food crops, crazy amounts of unoccupied land, ready access to transportation if we had drivers. Maybe the most restrictive resource is water and workforce. No magic fix for the former, but immigration would directly fix the later.

    You may not want more towns/cities, and additional building should be done with pollution in mind, but it really comes down to 'not in my backyard'-ism. There are a lot of people that exist, through no fault of their own, and to say they should live in even more cramped and dangerous environments than you just so you can afford more elbow room is exactly my point. It's not legal or logistics reasons the US doesn't want more immigration, it's primarily culture and racism. Good or bad, i'd be willing to bet when someone moves in down the street with a German accent most people will think, at worst, it's kind of interesting, but if they are dark skinned or speak Spanish, a whole bunch of people that didn't bat an eye at the German immigrant, legal or otherwise, will suddenly have concerns about 'over population'.

  • Second on the glass print bed. You can put it right on top of the existing bed and fasten it with binder clips. If it's thick enough it will span any flaws in the existing bed and be nearly perfectly flat so you have a consistent platform to level instead of dips and waves.

    Just adjust the z stop, and then print single layer leveling prints and adjust the bed slowly while it prints. The biggest things to watch for are where it prints too thin, it will look squeezed out, and where it isn't close enough it won't stick. It seems like a lot of work but after a few runs it starts to look better. Doing other simpler leveling test prints are frustrating because all you see is the end result.

    Another thing that I've run into that resulted in leveling issues is if your z heights are different from one side to the other. It's not obvious, but if the z screw of the left is different than the right, you can level all day but it will still try lifting on one side. Run the zaxis up to about 20mm on the left and then move the head to the right and check the height there. A hiccup or crash in the past could have gotten this out of line, but you can manually bring them back to square by manually turning the screw and get things back parallel.

    Last thing that really messes with things when you're troubleshooting and then abandoning the printer for awhile is filament getting wet. You can get things dead on, but if the filament has been unprotected for a few days, the slight swelling will fight you when you're already frustrated.

    Then, the last thing is measuring extrusion. Raise the head up like 100 mm, Mark the filament 70mm above the head, and use the controls and tell it to extrude 10mm at a time. Do this 3 times and then measure how far away your mark is. By the math, it should be 40mm away from the head. If you're more than 1mm either way, you're probably going to consistently see the issues your mentioning and no amount of need leveling is going to solve it. Technically a simple fix, but there is some math and code to send to the printer and someone here can easily help along the way.

  • No, not on it's own, but it's rarely on its own. In the US opposition to illegal immigrants and racism tracks nearly one to one.

    One could imagine a country where illegal immigration itself was a distinct problem, where the society was balanced in such a way that legal immigration was at an optimal rate and additional people coming into the country had downsides that outstripped the positives, when though, for example, the immigrants were of the same culture/class/standing as the existing citizens.

    The US, on the other hand, is nowhere near an optimal legal immigration rate, even though we benefit pretty significantly from both legal and illegal immigration. Illegal immigrants, for example, contribute significantly to the economy while not drawing 'as many' benefits away. Overwhelmingly the actual arguments against illegal immigration are grounded in cultural differences and language and, to put it simply, the desire for one class to want a reason to consider themselves better than another class by an easily recognizable yardstick.

  • It's only half joking, and this wouldn't be assumed at the administration but in demonstrating the loopholes in the laws that already exist. Too many people see Republicans doing it and letting them get away with it and look the other way. The idea would be to do things that are disliked but legal, and would make Republicans look weak if they ignore it when the enemy does it.

  • Well, by definition, indefinitely mean a timeline that is not defined. It could have been indefinitely and back on the air later that night and still have been 'indefinitely' if that hadn't been decided beforehand.

  • I think the left needs to play the game we at once point half jokingly accused trump of. Start committing acts so obviously outside of the intent of the law, but safely within the letter of the law, that the right takes advantage of it and sues our changes the law to tighten the loopholes. Fire people for being Christian, forbid a newspaper from reporting a negative story, publicly accept insider information and bread about how much money you made by knowing when to buy and sell, openly accept a bribe by starting a fake crypto, and cashing out right after a foreign company buys it for a million per coin and then dumps it. Make people understand openly how many hidden rules are free and open for the rich and political and shut them down.

  • He did not seriously say the valhalla line, did he? Please tell me that was actual satire?

  • Can we find the person who, for no apparent reason, interpreted manufacturers markings as apparent 'trans ideology' and ask him wtf that was supposed to accomplish? I mean if you don't know what some markings mean, aside from blatant bias is there any possible way to get to 'trans ideology' from manufacturers markings? Are they using male/female icons? Emojis? Printing them in rainbow colors?

  • Seriously, who the fuck would that book have been given to to sign, that would forge a message from fuckwit nobody Trump back then? Who would possibly have anything to gain by both faking a message, and it being 'that' message, just a bland, shallow half inside joke sounding thing with a drawing?

  • Seems like you missed something there, op didn't mention how much the China models actually cost. Only that they're subsidized and that we should also subsidize

  • Makes that 'are we the baddies?' a whole lot easier to answer.

  • Dumb title, should have been 'ceo fires employee for refusing direct instructions'. 'onboarding' isn't even trying it, it's just getting it set up. Dumb, and leaning into ai way to heavily, but half of a ceos job is to make decisions. If they were required to only make good ones there would be no ceos. Not that that would necessarily be a bad thing either.

  • It's because the song was bad?

  • Oh nooooooooo

  • It knows what it did

  • NSFW Removed

    Recovery a lost wallet

    Jump
  • Scam?

  • What a perfect example of someone 'not' trying to cheat the system being held to a ridiculously higher bar than those who are so used to cheating that they do it in their sleep.

    Basically, cheat at everything and when you get called out on it, do something worse so the 'evidence' and questions immediately become trivial because there's something far worse to address. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat.

    Don't worry, if you think there is a limit where 'how can i do something worse and still get away with it?'... Apparently there isn't.

  • From what I've seen, hail rarely harms the paint at all before the point where it will leave dents.

  • Likely a mixture of these answers, though if you want to wait for an expert to weigh in maybe ask for that. A roadway is obviously a very different environment with a lot of money and research put into ensuring it can handle a lot of traffic and weight, having to accommodate worst case scenarios so it's obviously going to have a very strong base, and a comparitively very durable and thick base of asphalt. Your driveway, on the other hand, is probably going to be covered in a mixture very much driven by price. If you do the minimum underlayment and thickness, you're probably going to need to give it every advantage possible to avoid rework.

  • Pretty sure that was the joke. I don't know how they can lie about the height of someone who must certainly be one of the most photographed people in the world (POTUS, I mean, why in the world anyone would want to photograph Trump himself is beyond me), but pretty sure even that one is wrong. The others are much easier to lie about, even if they are obviously wrong.