Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)D
帖子
2
评论
215
加入于
7 mo. ago

  • Capitalism

    跳过
  • I agree. Unfortunately, I think it's the best we have right now. The subtleties of who is and isn't the bourgeoisie takes a level of brain power that the average person just does not have today.

    On the plus side, most if not all billionaires are the bourgeoisie. And "billionaires are bad" is much better than "billionaires are good" which was the thinking in the 2000s.

  • I'll have to look into matrix. Thank you

  • Hosting a chat room meant you had to self host or trust someone else's server.

    There is no concept of groups. So you had to create several channels with some kind of naming scheme. There is no way to see them in a group. You just need to know about them as a chatter.

    History is not saved by default. Most used a 3rd party server to host a history log, which is more work.

    There is no audio, video, screen sharing.

    You can't reply to a chat with an emoji. You can't edit your previous chats.

    You can't reply to a specific chat unless you get specific like copying the original chat.

    Don't get me wrong. I hated that discord owns most of the communication online.

    I wish there was a simple and easy to use open source tool that did all of that in a single package.

    I don't mind self-hosting but if I have to self-host several interacting services that I need to update manually, it becomes a pain.

  • Capitalism

    跳过
  • The bourgeoisie and the proletariats. Not much has changed.

  • Not exactly. The Democrats often behave like a controlled opposition party to the Republicans though.

  • I don't think this is a long term sustainable solution.

  • Maybe, with genetic modification. I think sex has the knobs maxed out for our current chemistry.

  • Organizing. Building community.

  • I find computers endlessly fascinating and they are easier to understand than social interactions. If you took away easier forms of entertainment I would be seeking harder forms of entertainment. Probably also starting a revolution.

  • As others have said, you are stealing kinetic energy from the planet to go faster. Or giving kinetic energy back to the planet to go slower.

    So, relatively, you slow down and the planet speeds up or the planet slows down and you speed up.

  • Nobal savage posting

  • I think the problem you're going to run into is most of the people who were against the metoo movement are the same people who we need to convince.

  • Never, they donate to get the politicians reelected.

  • 已删除

    Permanently Deleted

    跳过
  • Don't worry, we were never going to make anything 100% accessible anyway, that would be impossible.

  • That's the problem with having a partner. They just think you're so cute and hot. And you think they're cute and hot. It all gets very distracting.

  • I remember struggling with the idea that all companies care more about the bottom line than anything else. People are good and care about good things. How can companies who are made of people always cause problems? There must be at least one good company out there, right?

    It's only after I spent some time in the world that I figured out that money really messes with things. It pressures companies to do whatever they can get away with. It separates the people who run the companies from the bad outcomes that company creates.

    And at the end of the day everyone needs to make a choice. Live and participate in a system that causes problems, or die. I chose to live and I don't blame anyone else for choosing to live.

  • You're not who they were talking to. You're already awake.

  • Do leftists really have a problem understanding both sides can be bad? I figure you have to be pretty well versed in that in order to be a leftist.

  • In a capitalist economic system, you can never be sure.