Skip Navigation

Posts
13
Comments
523
Joined
9 mo. ago

Blog: https://dastanktal.planam.link/

Mostly on Hexbear.

Free Palestine!

Baby Marxist. Feral debater. Will continue to "argue" as long as you give attention.

I return in kind the energy sent to me.

Libs be prepared 😈

  • No, I don't care.

    The person mentioned that there were numerous other places. I don't know what they are. I'm not gonna sit here and go after them

    I just think it's funny you're having a total meltdown about this.

    It's even better that you went out and made your own community in pifed.

    What was Philip telling me that I need to go do? Oh, yeah, that I should go touch some grass. I wonder if I'm actually the person that needs to touch that grass.

  • Are you claiming that Hamas, systemically, as official policy, weaponized sexual violence on October 7th?

    Because then, yeah, I think we'd have a problem.

    Edit:

    And it looks like you're referring to that brand-new study that was just put out by that Israeli think-tank in their best effort to try and change what the definition of sexual violence is in order to get Hamas Blacklisted? Yeah, I remember that study. It's already been specifically discredited by the UN and a number of NGOs.

  • Nah we are just enjoying all the bit of Schadenfreude.

    You should be telling that to PJ who spends way too much time on Lemmy. I'm not the one who created a community just a removed about being blocked. Let them know to touch some grass while you're at it.

    Also, the irony of you saying this about a power user who posts quite literally hundreds of times a week.

  • He's a genocide-supporting Zionist radlib who thinks it's fun to spend his day insulting people who bring in Marxist/anarchist theory.

    By the way, radlib is not an insult. It describes his political position 🙄

    Finally, he even admitted that he is a loudmouth (tangentially), so I don't know what you're going on about here. Someone who will argue with you for 100 plus comments I would consider to be a "loudmouth".

    And, somehow, that's not abusive. PJ giving downvotes and arguing about politics, though, is.

    It would be insulting to describe what he does as debating or arguing. He spends most of the time using falicious techniques in order to try and point score the best he can, so that he doesn't actually have to engage with anything you say, and then when you bring up something specific, he'll just ignore the point.

    It's also entirely inappropriate to follow a user around to small communities that you're not a part of to downvote when the voting system is supposed to be whether or not a post matches the tone of the community.

    It's unfortunate you're unable to view nuance.

  • https://lemmy.ml/post/33527767

    Yeah, this had put a target on his back in any lefty instance.

    Also, following a user from tiny community to tiny community that you're not a part of just to downvote their posts that you disagree with personally because you got into an argument with somebody is a bit extreme and I agree with the admins that they did the right thing.

  • I would love to read that context if you have it somewhere.

    Based on the conversations I've had with him, it's gotta be gold.

  • He goes out of his way to private message you? 😅

  • Nah, I just read through the screenshot you posted a little more carefully and noticed how you were going from tiny communities with less than 50 users that you were not a part of and were downvoting that person's posts, which is a direct violation of the spirit of the communities and the way the voting system on Lemmy is supposed to work.

    I went from thinking the admin's a little heavy-handed to thinking you earned it. 👍

  • I kinda think you made your own bed.

    Edit:

    Following someone from community to community to downvote, things that you disagree with personally, is an abuse of the vote system, and an abuse of the community system, I think he was absolutely right in blocking you.

    Let this be a lesson. Downvote people in the threads that you're participating in and in the communities you belong to, and stay out of the communities you don't.

  • He tends to get into a fight every single time I see him post and somebody says something that's even slightly controversial, which results in an easily hundred long comment thread.

    He's more than willing to follow you around from thread to thread to and from community to community If he sees something on your profile he doesn't like or he disagrees with your political opinions.

    If this is a Lemmy, anarchist instance, full of a bunch of super lefties, they're not gonna appreciate a Radlib coming in trying to start shit up and downvoting a bunch of people. They're probably just gonna block him like they have.

    I think the recommendation here is if you're gonna downvote people, you probably want to just stick to downvoting people directly in the thread you're engaging with and not go in that person's profile and downvote every single thing they've ever done. Or claim that every single thing they've ever done is something you disagree with.

    Unfortunately, he's a prolific proster, and some of his stuff is funny 🤷

  • Oh, he's a goddamn zionist, too?

  • I mean, if you're downvoting everybody's page, and claiming that you just disagree with everything they post, then yeah, I can see why they would ban you.

    Unfortunately for you, you're not exactlu sunshine and rainbows, so I can imagine people aren't exactly willing to just take you at your word.

    I don't care, I am just pointing out the hypocrisy of the situation.

  • Oh, I don't like engaging with him or any of his posts because he tends to be a loudmouth radlib but he is a power user and his posts on other communities are just fine.

    It'd be nice if I could, like, put a comment on one of his political posts, though, without it turning into a gigantic, massive thread arguing about the specifics of electoralism and lesser evil and all of that nonsense.

  • Just so we're clear, you're explaining that FDR got those things through by taking actions that he was able to do, and that if he hadn't, we would not have gotten.

    IE he is directly responsible for the permanent creation of multiple agencies which would not have been created without his foresight, plan, or public push.

    What was that about him carrying out plans by Congress when he constantly had to wield public authority to make Congress do the things they were supposed to do? You just not gonna mention the fact that he had to threaten the supreme court multiple times to stack the court or remove justices in order to get them to play along with his reformations?

    Besides, the democrats haven't done anything like that in around 79 years which goes to my point that they aren't doing anything.

  • Hoping nothing but good things from this

  • Yeah, I wonder why it's called the FDR reformations and not the reformations of the 73rd Congress. 🙄

  • The internet was never designed to exist in a capitalist hellscape. It was designed for the free sharing of information by people putting random servers on the network.

  • Been really excited to see what's coming out of Mexico. We'll have to see how it continues to improve the situation.