But adult swim is specifically geared towards a mature audience and Steven Universe is just TV-PG. Any network will be more limited in the boundaries they will push with more mass market shows. Even the correct decision, I am sure, did negatively affect their bottom line in the short term.
Sure, here is one of my guesses, though the site is actually pretty complicated, so this is a very simplistic reason as an example. Assuming they use a static site generator. Each Article is it's own WYSIWYG. They have a special document format that allows for inline notation of annotations. Someone was editing the doument to update an annotation, they left out a closing bracket and the SSG just decides to not render invalid annotations, so everything after the missed closed bracket was assumed to be bad data.
It's not "ok", it's an obvious mistake. I only emphasize the context because people are acting like, even if this was intentional, that it has any effect.
I wondered if the idea was before the visor came off, anyone could have been a dude for all they cared, but once the visor came off, they saw a sexy woman and that changed their interaction.
Ok, everyone ITT needs to calm down. Do you really think this is some roundabout attempt to amend the Constitution? Obvi it is an issue, but there are many many ways this could happen.
People act like it is somehow impossible that webpages can't get corrupted.
My bet, they use a static site gen, someone added some unclosed escape sequence while making changes to an annotation in a document and the SSG built it anew with the rest of Article 1 being left behind.
But adult swim is specifically geared towards a mature audience and Steven Universe is just TV-PG. Any network will be more limited in the boundaries they will push with more mass market shows. Even the correct decision, I am sure, did negatively affect their bottom line in the short term.