Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)D
Posts
4
Comments
1699
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • To be fair they never cared about environment. A paper is something easy to recycle and certainly not the most polluting material to produce.

    It was more about saving money, greenwashing and pushing a conversion towards digital archiving (which is much more efficient that paper)

  • People are against it because several reasons.

    First because it's a very specific taste/opinion that they don't share. You are saying that "all would be more appealing without softcore porn", but it seems that you are the only one who thinks that here, most people don't care or even like it. We could also put a filter to blurry dog pictures for people scare of dogs, where does it end? Until which point personal tastes should have their own explicit filters? It ends in a "word filter" which is already usable.

    Also I would say that most people is against this because it reads as a first step towards a "porn ban". We have no puritan advertisements or pay processor to please. People here like the freedom. And that would be a step in the opposite direction. It reads a little like so many discourses we are seeing in so many places to make them "family friendly" and to "protect the children". I would suppose that due the nature of the fediverse (which is a push back against those people controlling our internet) is against anything that looks like that.

  • Can you get that on any family member or a stranger just by asking for it?

    Really?

  • I don't know any place which have the proposed "soft nsfw" filter separate from "nsfw".

    Comparison with reddit is weird as reddit r/all is full of ""artistic"" pictures or paintings of naked women.

    Also the fediverse is not really like reddit. The more the platform grows the more useless All becomes. Try to go to mastodon and browse by "all" it's unusable. Either pick an instance with a good "local" you like or all is not really that important. I don't think it's a "first impressions", first impression is "local". All is never going to be a curated feed, not a consistent one. It's a federated platform, which means a LOT of diversity and variety on communities and posts.

    Also I don't see or even want to start consider anything that shows a little skin "nsfw". I think that's a very personal taste that should not be universally applied.

    I really don't buy the argument here.

  • Oooohh. That explains it.

  • Slow growth is still growth though.

    Same as a reduction in inflation does not mean prices go down.

  • It's going to be catgirls and catboys. We all know it.

  • Ask Norman Reedus. Everyone and their sister in UK is Norman Reedus now.

  • Remember remember the 5th of November.

  • Music - music library

    Playlist - personal playlists

    Shows - all the tv shows

    Movies - All the movies

    Shared - a special library that's used for sharing content with friends without having to share all my library.

    Podcast - for podcast

    Sounds - non musical audio files (like nature sounds for relaxation)

    Youtube - library connected with tube archivist

    Subtitulate - special library to temporarily put shows that I want to download subtitles, to have more control over it.

    Anyway, I've been thinking about taking music out, and use other service for it. As the search feature is currently unusable with so much content.

  • My bets are on invisible Soviet Union or maybe superspeed USA.

  • Do you have time to talk about our lord Rust? Did you know it died for our bugs so we don't have to debug them at run time?

  • The pigs start walking.

  • PTB for the mods.

    And racism by the reported user. I think at this point in story we should know that the action of part of a ethnic/religious group (no matter how big) doesn't automatically represent a 100% of the group.

  • Every atom of the universe should have its own ip.

  • Out of those I only know blockchain being used in spain as a way to ensure legality of accounting books, and that business are not commiting fraud by deleting invoices. Not in a public ledger or anything, just a hashed chain that they need to send to irs equivalent.

  • Go on tinder or a music pub, whatever he prefers, and approach people that he finds attractive.

    Go with respect and making things clear, to avoid issues. He would need a few tries but surely he would be able to find who finds him attractive and it's down for some uncompromised sexy time.

  • It's always funny how the state is powerful enough to enforce a mass surveillance and control system on anyone who wants to use internet. But when it comes to tax the rich "it cannot be done, it's too difficult".

    And yes, I'm looking at you """""""labour""""""" party.

  • On bars and tinder?

    Without being good locking you go nowhere nowadays. You don't even get a chance to show how funny, witty, common interests you have, much less to show that you have a good hygiene, for that you need a date first. And you are not getting swiped right if you are not attractive.

    That is good for other kind of relationships, meeting people in other places and flirting. That can get you laid, but not the same type of quick casual sex that op is asking for. That's more of a "start a relationship" kind of deal.

    For the kind of date that goes "let's have a drink to figure that you are not a psychopath that's going to kill me and then to my place to fuck", you need to be attractive (or open about having sex with other man).

    I like to be clear with this. Because there's tons of very good young men, who are funny, have great hygiene, are witty, are nice. And they have to confront the reality that without being good locking they will have to assume that that kind of sex is most likely out of the table, and they better try to build other kind of relationships instead. i prefer that to gaslighting them into thinking they don't get laid because they are terrible people on the inside or have terrible hygiene, when this is most likely not true. And when they are seeing truly terrible people getting laid regardless because they are good looking.

    My advice is that if you are not good looking you have mostly two options, think about experimenting with gay sex (you might like it) or completely opt out the dating scene (specially dating apps) and just build into making friends and potential love partners. Without really expecting quick casual sex, as that will lead to huge frustrations.