I've been saying since a long time, the only way a social network makes sense is if it's public. It's a public forum, just like the central square in a city, it makes zero sense giving private companies the kind of power that comes with controlling it.
What else can they do? I think what's despicable is that no other dems are backing this. At least all dems should back it, so that it's 100% visible for everyone who is responsible for children dying from preventable diseases.
Does that seem likely to you? I guess it depends on the outcome of the probes by both congress and senate, but it doesn't seem likely to me that anything will come out of them. If even it did, he would still have to be found guilty by a military court I think. Unless all the strikes are declared illegal due to the US not being at war in which case it could go to a civil court, as far as I understand. That would mean the administration admits that the whole campaign had no legal ground though, which I don't see happening. Plus the supreme court seemingly being completely corrupted as well..
Obviously what I wrote above is completely impossible, there's no way to invade the US. And by free world I certainly don't mean Russia or China either, so no chance. This can only be resolved from within the US. I hope it will, but at the moment it looks grim.
I agree with you, though proponents will tell you that's by design. Supposedly, it's like with high-level languages. You don't need to know the actual instructions in assembly anymore to write a program with them. I think the difference is that high-level language instructions are still (mostly) deterministic, while an LLM prompt certaily isn't.
It's quite obvious by now that the US military will not decline following illegal orders. That's what led to most atrocities committed by German troops in WW2. The free world must get ready to ally and invade the US to prevent further escalation.
There's a super easy way to find out the answer to that question that does not require a screen.. it's incredibly innovative and kind of magic though, so I understand it's not everyone's first thought.
Thanks for the additional context, but that's a dumb argument. There is no constitutional ground for these strikes, with or without his bullshit product, because there is no war. They're committing straight up murder which is (still) illegal.
Why would nvidia have new money to invest when its stock goes up? That's not how the stock market works, you buy stock from other investors, not the company. Unless they finance all their investments with debt and use their higher valuation to get easier access to that financing. Which seems unlikely.
Don't get me wrong, I 100% think AI is a crap bubble, but I don't think you understood how this scam works.
I've been saying since a long time, the only way a social network makes sense is if it's public. It's a public forum, just like the central square in a city, it makes zero sense giving private companies the kind of power that comes with controlling it.