People say this but, if advertising didn't work, companies would have stopped paying for ads long time ago. It works for them, we view ads and then we are willing to pay more for a product that is worth less; it's this simple.
The only solution for us is to avoid ads at all cost.
I think the point is that the convenience of being able to ride a bike without having a helmet at hand is something beneficial for the group. That it, there would be fewer cyclists if wearing a helmet was mandatory, and that would harm cyclists as a group.
By all means, if you consistently go over 20km/h on bike, wear a helmet, as at that speed it's starting to get dangerous.
Is this right? Out of curiosity, how do these sites flag themselves as content for adults?
Obviously, this is the solution. Sites that do this correctly, and software that detects the metadata. Parents are the ones that need to choose the correct software and enable the correct settings.
Sites that do not set the correct metadata are legible to be banned by authorities.
A period (already a small character) + a space is sufficient to separate sentences.
Also, if there are more than one space together, it's hard to count them. That is, the more spaces you keep together, the harder it gets to know whether you've put the correct number of spaces.
I'd rather Mozilla ask for donations than to give me ads and bloatware. I'd be more than happy to donate periodically. If they don't correct the current course, I'm not sure for how much longer they'll keep loyal users like me. I'm sick of having to turn a bunch of things off every time, and of having to be vigilant about the new crap they keep introducing.
If it's to favor bikes over scooters, that's probably fine. If it's to please the car lobby, that's a sad, corrupt step back for society and democracy.
I think it is clear that it's just a matter of time that a faster, more secure, free and open source operating system will win over a worse alternative.
New World, by L'ArcenCiel