Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)C
Posts
0
Comments
44
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Why should someone who is already breaking the law also enjoy the power of legal coercion to force you from a place you had the legal right to be, though?

    “Well, we don’t want the situation to escalate. Someone could get hurt.” Why should the law protect only the welfare of criminals? Of the person actively breaking the law?

    The issue with “Stand your Ground” laws is that the alternative is nonsensical if your view expands to include the rights and welfare of people who act consistent with the law.

  • If 50,000 gallons of water is the best and most effective and safest option to douse a battery fire, and that’s what firefighters did, then why is anyone complaining about it?

  • Where does it say to use 50,000 gallons of it?

  • So what you’re saying is that, in fact, all EV’s do have lithium batteries

  • Surely firefighters know better than to use water on a battery?

  • "Capitalism is when stores aren't hotels"