Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)C
Posts
0
Comments
96
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • But 99% of people won't. Choosing that platform massively shrinks your community.

    I'm not saying don't do it and try to grow that ecosystem if you want to. I'm all for federated becoming the standard going forward. But don't judge people not wanting to massively compromise their project with a platform that actually is massively worse because it doesn't have people there.

  • But, to be clear, I am not asking you to use inferior platforms for philosophical or altruistic reasons.

    Except you just called people selfish for it a paragraph up. A platform that depends on human interaction without humans to interact with is an inferior platform regardless of technical merit.

    Going where people are isn't selfish. It's rational.

  • Not everyone values the same things you do. Flatpaks aren't the cause of the fact that different applications don't function correctly with different versions of libraries; they're just the solution.

    Flatpak is better for normal people. It's better for most advanced users who don't want to micromanage compatibility issues. And it really doesn't have an impact on people who do want to micromanage because all your alternative ways to install software are still there.

  • If you're actually expecting people to transition without asking for help on a regular basis, you don't know people.

    You just made yourself their IT guy for life.

  • It's not "digital" when it literally kills people.

  • Those nature videos as backgrounds in a room with a strong color scheme?

    Except I wouldn't even sort of trust them not to veer into some jackass ranting about something stupid.

  • I think it's a mixed bag. Some of the friction is just because people are used to the stupid ways Windows does stuff.

    But there's other stuff like needing to manually change some downloaded files to have permission to execute that it makes sense for casual users to find confusing.

  • You may wish to pick a distro that makes a point of nvidia compatibility.

    I use nobara, who have a few options in the welcome script specifically to improve compatibility with nvidia. I've specifically heard popOS mentioned several times as one people have liked with nvidia as well.

    Some only ship with or distribute alternative open source nvidia drivers that tank performance.

  • Probably because they use MacOS.

  • I know what sub I'm in, and while I don't pirate anything, I'm not going to argue the ethics at all.

    But according to the article, they were literally advertising to customers that they were sling and selling them devices preloaded to look like they were sling. Again, I'm not here to argue the merits of piracy generally. I follow the sub without being a pirate because many of the legal/technical issues around piracy affect anyone who wants to own their media and browse the internet with some level of privacy. But distributors of any of that content aren't credible if they're lying to the end users. Lying to tell people you're actually the real service isn't cool.

  • Try it?

    I haven't really needed to virtualize anything lately, but my understanding is that some of the options on Linux are pretty light weight. Frpm discussion I've seen, I think distrobox could resolve the issue with minimal overhead if you have issues natively, though I haven't personally experimented with it or its limitations.

  • Exactly. You'd think with the two things they're really competitive on being raw flops and memory, they'd be a viable option for ML and scientific compute, but they're just such a pain to work with that they're pretty much irrelevant.

  • No, the mindset that the storage is less than pennies worth and this usage would have to explode massively to even approach negligible.

    A device that is affected in any way by a GB of storage space is going to choke on 50 other things way before you get to that.

  • What's the use case where storage is at enough of a premium to matter? None of this is targeting a server where you're getting silly with optimizing storage, and even the smallest storage on most consumer facing hardware is filled by media one way or another. It straight up doesn't matter to a reasonable end user. Storage is less than dirt cheap.

  • It's just a computer (or program, depending on context). It can do whatever you want it to.

    If I want to write/modify a mail server that watches video feeds from 6 different beaches and only bothers accepting mail when beaches 2, 3 and 5 are empty and beaches 1, 4, and 6 have 500 people, nothing is stopping me. It's stupid and a waste of time, but it's a computer. It can run arbitrary code.

    That's ignoring that if you read what he wants, it would be a client to the actual recipient mail server and only needs to actually serve the web interface so that he can access his email from various browsers.

  • They're just protocols. There's nothing preventing a program from interacting with both. Webmail isn't some mystical art no one's ever thought of before.

  • You understand that computers can use more than one port?

    There's nothing abnormal about what he's requesting.

  • This doesn't make sense.

    A website is basically just the responses a server sends to a browser. That server has any functionality you want it to.