Skip Navigation

Posts
31
Comments
204
Joined
2 yr. ago

lemm.ee went down on 30/05/25. I've moved to - lemmy.zip/u/clot27

  • Well telegram is already profitable with showing minimal ad, and no user data selling. You just can't make up points that going for IPO will make them less secure, why so much rush? Just wait and watch what happens.

  • The plus point is, telegrams client is open source, so you can always make a client which is less bloated (I am sure there are plenty already in the market).

  • the thing is, Ive been using its crypto features for freelancing and everything went smoothly till date (been using it for 1 year). If you term crypto in general is scam, thats different thing

  • whats exactly funny?

  • hows that scam lmao

  • they dont care about windows that much anymore, just ai propoganda left and right

  • Hope they focus more on privacy now.

  • How dumb you can be protesting for a chinese spyware which is destroying IQ of children, americans.

  • Here's another response I got from someone from radicle regarding this.

    That's a great Q.

    Radicle can support a federated model, where known major seeds are connected with multiple smaller clusters. >Radicle supports also completely self-sustaining and disconnected clusters of nodes networked between themselves >within that cluster. And of course any other network topography in between.

    There's a promising active proposal to establish a dedicated new Radworks Organization tasked with solving the >incentivization and reward problem for seeds. https://community.radworks.org/t/discussion-rgp-22-start-the...

    Additionally, similar to how one can "star" a repo on GitHub, one can "seed" a repo on Radicle. "Starring" a repo is >often a toast of support, akin to an emoji reaction, with little more effect other than that, but in Radicle "seeding" a >project, goes beyond incrementing a vanity metric: it actively supports propagating that project across the Radicle >network. The count of seedings per repo can also be used as a differentiator between original and "copy-cat" ones.

  • proprietary, why did they mention that if they wanna marketing broo

  • Basically they are copying whatsapp..

  • Same question. P2p was initially used to pirate stuff e.g. movies which isn't a private property and streaming that through p2p made a lot of sense. But for codes I don't know if its appropriate or not...

  • "both" Why are you assuming there are only 2 genders?

  • Its bad for sexual exploitation of any gender,,

  • While the fact is privacy has been there top priority since starting, heck they even have e2ee chats. No data leaks report so far

  • nice argument comrade, "I've heard"

  • Its better because: It can sustain big public groups (upto 200k peoples), channels with unlimited subscribers, unlimited cloud storage (files upto 4gb, synced across devices), powerful bots, web apps, native crypto support, you can do pretty much anything within the app (literally a superapp), heaven for pirates, stickers, video calls, live streams, etc. unlimited devices could be signed up for one account, messages sync across devices, free with minimal ads, premium to get more features, completely run by users support and ad platform, no external entity involved. secret chats for end 2 end encryption chats and much more.

  • Its better than signal in every aspect except privacy (still better than whatsapp in that and arguably a secure messaging app).

  • very short ads without any external links. Only visible to users who havent bought telegram premium and only one ad per channel that too only if you scroll down