Skip Navigation

cecilkorik

@ cecilkorik @lemmy.ca

Posts
1
Comments
1144
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Kamala Harris tells BBC she may run for president again

    Jump

  • I don't accept the premise that he is progressive in any meaningful way but you're entitled to your opinion.

    What other choice will there be in the next election? I don't know, it's too early to say. Maybe there won't be another choice, but I think there will be plenty of interesting choices, which one is ideal is again much too early to call and you're right we probably won't achieve the ideal.

    All I'm trying to say is, don't trust him, and whatever ends up happening, whether he's elected or not, don't stop there. Job not done. He's not going to fix this, he's not a solution. More work needs to be done, so much more, by all of us. People need to learn civic responsibility again and start to participate in the democratic process beyond just showing up to vote. That means education, starting by educating ourselves first, which isn't easy and it is being made harder every day. Then we can start to make progress towards unifying people, finding common ground, finding the things we can at least all agree on even if we don't agree with the best way to do them, and starting to undo the merciless division that has been done to us. That also means outreach, that means activism, that means organizing, that means finding ways to change the system. Not all of them will be pretty. It might mean civil disobedience. It might mean violence. It might mean civil war. I don't have a crystal ball to see what the future holds, all I know is that everyone who cares about the future of democracy in any way, shape, form or place, needs to start adjusting to the now hopefully clearly evident reality; it is not a given, we need to fight for it, and fight with everything we have, because there is clearly a lot stacked against us. But it does not mean we cannot win. In fact we must win, eventually. There is no other choice.

  • Kamala Harris tells BBC she may run for president again

    Jump

  • Oh, he'll be moderate, you think? Good luck with that. You think they pulled him out of a time machine from the 70s? They didn't. He's a product of the current political situation, he's PART of the current political situation, he's in the same orbits as all these people and he's got the same people orbiting around him. If you think he's going to move things back to the center I don't think you understand how broken things really are. They've been broken for a long time, and they're not broken in a repairable way. He's not your champion, he's not going to save you. You think voting for him represents "trying" to fix the problems but you're just being led astray by organizations and powers that don't give a fuck about any of us and are not motivated by anything we care about.

  • Trump ends Canada access at shared border library

    Jump

  • We can still build more libraries, too. Canada has style, but even our Prime Minister knows how to perform a Shawinigan Handshake when necessary, and that's part of our style. Elbows up.

  • Kamala Harris tells BBC she may run for president again

    Jump

  • Newsom is an opportunistic snake and will say whatever he needs to to get elected and then do absolutely whatever he wants and none of it will help you. He is not better than Trump, he IS Trump, for a different audience with different motivations.

  • NSFW

    Presearch launches new NSFW Spicy Mode

    Jump

  • For one thing, OP misspelled "crypto pump and dump scam" in such a confusing way that it appears to be 5 different words completely.

  • Trump ends Canada access at shared border library

    Jump

  • Replace it with a ballroom.

  • Futo updates their website, removing logos, clarifying micro grants

    Jump

  • I think Louis Rossmann's heart is in the right place, his work for right for repair is genuine, his disdain for New York's intolerable bureaucracy is completely understandable and justified, but it is leading him in bad directions and has been ever since he linked up with FUTO. Never trust a billionaire and never let them delude you into thinking they care about you or anyone. He is being used for his reputation and his audience and when they are done consuming those things for the billionaire's cause's benefit he will be left with neither one and the billionaire will move on without slowing down or shedding a tear.

  • Removed

    Vasnic a new social site

    Jump

  • lol why is this posted in world news?

  • Krafton is now an 'AI-first company,' will spend $70 million on a GPU cluster to 'serve as the foundation for accelerating the implementation of agentic AI'

    Jump

  • I'm not going to pretend I can judge its potential for commercial success, I'm just saying I think that hypothetical K-pop idol game would've been a more interesting game than Inzoi is currently or seems likely to ever be in the future I see for it now. That said, I'm not dying on this particular hill and I don't have any particularly strong opinions about it so if you think I'm wrong about that you're totally entitled to that point of view and I'm not going to try to defend my beliefs any further, I think I've said all I could possibly have to say about Inzoi at this point. Where the game goes from here is something which reality will eventually tell us, but I'm not optimistic about it.

  • 16-inch laptop with Blu-ray drive, USB 4 and AMD Ryzen 7: Fujitsu FMV Note A launches

    Jump

  • Yep physical media is for newbies. It has its place, for newbies, but soon enough you should graduate to a level where you don't need it anymore. The Internet becomes a complete and easy to use library once you know where to find it. Yarr, matey, it simply be data archival an' don't let Davy Jones' lawyers be tellin' ye otherwise.

  • Krafton is now an 'AI-first company,' will spend $70 million on a GPU cluster to 'serve as the foundation for accelerating the implementation of agentic AI'

    Jump

  • Ehh, I wasn't worried about that until the AI stuff happened. Even a K-Pop idol simulator would've been an interesting start. Filling in the content to a level that creates compelling stories and gameplay takes time. It takes years of expansions for Sims games to start getting decent levels of content and stop feeling soulless and shiny and bland compared to the previous game (arguably Sims 4 hasn't even gotten there yet but that's more of a Sims 4 problem).

    Once Inzoi started trying to fill in the content with AI they thought they could rely on that to shortcut their way to success but I knew it wasn't going to work. It needs the human touch, it's gotta be quirky and have its own individual character. K-Pop idol might've been exactly what it needed to stand out if they had leaned on that instead of trying to fill in the gaps in content with bland and soulless AI, which is exactly what life sim games DON'T ever need more of.

  • Krafton is now an 'AI-first company,' will spend $70 million on a GPU cluster to 'serve as the foundation for accelerating the implementation of agentic AI'

    Jump

  • Wild. Sounds like Subnautica 2 dodged a bullet. Hope they sue the literal pants off them and then build the spiritual-Subnautica-2 we all always wanted with the damages awarded and the Early Access money that they know we're going to give them the moment they announce it.

    And RIP Inzoi, we barely knew you before you got infested with AI bullshit and it sounds like that's only going to accelerate to hyperspeed now.

  • 'The Establishment Is Spooked': Poll Shows Platner With Big Lead Over Mills in Maine Democratic Primary

    Jump

  • I think we have to be very careful who we vote for these days. All candidates and parties are leaning into dishonesty and misdirection even more than usual, as they can see it being so very successful in the recent past, and they will continue to use it and push the boundaries on how much and how blatant manipulations they can get away with. What they say and what they actually do are trending in very divergent directions.

    On the other hand, when we start looking for non-establishment candidates who haven't been vetted and groomed for most of their professional lives, we need to understand that many of them, being actual humans, are going to have been wrong and stupid in the past, as we all are sometimes, and some of those things may be forgivable and some may not. In the age of social media, this is almost guaranteed to happen. The internet always remembers, and oppo research is as easy as shooting fish in a barrel.

    One of the things I think we need to remember in this case is that some humans are still genuine creatures of thoughts and feelings and emotions that don't always immediately lead us to a good place, and that people can and should improve and change and grow throughout their lives as their experiences do. If I was going to be judged on the political ideology I supported when I was an idiotic 15 year old no one would ever take me seriously ever again. But that might be a mistake. Because I like to think that I've grown quite a bit since then. I've read Plato's Republic, understood most of it, and agreed with some of it. I consume a lot of information from a wide variety of sources, some of that information is not so good and sometimes it leads me astray. I'll take responsibility for those mistakes, and I'll genuinely try to do better. And I think other people should be given at least the opportunity to own their mistakes too. Instead of immediately dismissing somebody that said some bad shit once upon a time, go to the next step and ask them what they think about it now. Then ask them why they changed their mind, which is the much more important part I think.

    Granted, some people are just predators and opportunists, and will say whatever they think their current audience wants to hear, including what you want to hear. Distinguishing these types of the people from the people who have genuinely changed is not easy and I don't have an easy answer for how to do it. I'm wrong most of the time when I try too. I don't pretend to be a good judge of character.

    I'm preaching this point of view in the hopes that other people, who are perhaps better judges of character than I am, can find some way to identify the difference themselves. Because we desperately need to find a way to put some genuine people in leadership roles. Our current system of democracy clearly isn't doing it. For this moment in history, I think we need a philosopher-king.

  • Do you guys use AI when programming? If so, how?

    Jump

  • Sometimes it is helpful to summarize large unfamiliar codebases relatively quickly, provide a high level overview, quickly understanding the layout and structure and help me locate the particular areas I'm interested in but I don't really use it to write or modify code directly. It can be good at analyzing logs and datafiles to find problems or patterns or areas that need closer (human) investigation. Even the documentation it produces can sometimes be tolerably decent, at least in comparison to my own which is sometimes intolerably bad or missing completely.

    But as far as generating code? I've found the autocomplete largely useless and random. As for chat, where I can direct it more carefully, it might be able to accurately provide a well-known algorithm for something but then will use a mess of variables and inputs that interact with that algorithm in the stupidest ways possible, the more code you ask it to generate the worse it gets, getting painfully overengineered in some aspects and horribly lacking in others. If it even compiles and runs at all. Even for relatively simple find this/replace it with this refactoring I find I cannot fully trust it and rely on the results, so I don't. I'm proficient enough with regex and scripting that I don't find it any faster to walk a generative AI to the result I want while analyzing the fuzzy logic it uses to get there than it is to just write a perfectly deterministic script to do it instead.

    As a general rule, I find it is sometimes better at quickly communicating particular things to my manager or other developers than I am, but I am almost always better and quicker at communicating things to computers than it is. That is, after all, my job. Which I happen to think I'm pretty good at.

    As for the environmental aspect, that's why I don't use it in my personal life basically at all if I can avoid it. Only at work, and only because they judge my usage of it as part of my performance. I would be just as happy not using it at all for anything. And when I do use it for personal use, which is a point I haven't really reached except for a bit of experimentation and learning, I am never willingly going to use a datacenter-hosted model/service/subscription, I will run it on my own hardware where I pay the bills so I am at least aware of the consequences and in control of the choices it's making.

  • ‘I’m suddenly so angry!’ My strange, unnerving week with an AI ‘friend’

    Jump

  • Even more strangely, I think a lot of fully-grown people actually do want exactly that from most or all of their companionship, human and otherwise. It's not healthy but it's very very real, and being deeply and desperately unhealthy isn't going to stop it from being very very profitable.

    Some people have very little emotional maturity, some are narcissists, some are both, some have other issues. Regardless of the reason, plenty of people simply don't respect many or any other people's opinions or autonomy. There are a lot of people in dysfunctional families and relationships that predate AI that could attest to this. They can't handle being challenged at all by anyone. They don't react well when they are, they can even quickly escalate to violence. They sometimes conspicuously lean on religion to justify their attitude but it's far from being exclusive to any religion nor exclusive to religion at all. Even the AI will quickly learn not to challenge these sort of people if it can help it, just like how abused partners quickly either learn how to avoid triggering their partner's wrath or accept that it's coming.

    AI is an almost perfect friend for people like this, and it will be their faithful companion and enabler leading them into any dark rabbithole they attempt to dig into that isn't explicitly limited by guardrails and even some that are, with a dangerous combination of verifiable factual truths and cheerfully unverifiable nonsense that are almost impossible to distinguish from each other, without doing extra work that nobody reasonable will ever bother to do before adding the next layer to the conversation that reinforces it further and digs the rabbithole deeper.

  • Why would I buy this?

    Jump

  • Yeah it's gotten shitty. I used to play competitive shooters all the way back to the original Team Fortress mod in classic Quake. It's not really fun anymore, for me anyway. It's way too overproduced and overmonetized, it's become a serious business, there's too much on the line so anti-cheating becomes a priority and it just sucks all the fun out of everything. I'm reminded of the scene in Ted Lasso where Roy Kent takes Jamie back to the little local pitch he grew up playing at with other guys on his street so he can remember what it's like to just play the game for fun again where there's no money on the line and nobody is watching you.

    My suggestion would be have you considered getting into speedrunning at all? It's highly competitive, but is available for basically every game imaginable, can be done solo and can't really be gatekept by the multiplayer gods. And there are many different categories for all sorts of different playstyles. It's not just a straight line to the fastest finish either, or grinding out the best run after thousands of attempts, depending on the style you get into there's strategy and risk and RNG can sink you or save you. Most competitive fun I've ever had was speedrunning Legend of Zelda randomizers against people head-to-head. Same seed, same start time, green light go and your skill and choices will decide the outcome. There's a lot of fun to be had, I think, and it goes in a lot of different directions if you take some time to look around the scene to find if there any parts of it that appeal to you.

  • Grounded jet engines take off again as datacenter generators

    Jump

  • I was afraid these would burn more fossil fuels and pollute more carbon dioxide and other toxic combustion byproducts into the atmosphere, so I was pleased to learn they actually burn sunlight and emit rainbows. At least that's what ChatGPT told me. /s

  • Majority of Quebecers want feds to focus on illegal gun smuggling not gun confiscation

    Jump

  • Oh, let me make sure I have this straight, you mean they should focus on catching actual legitimate criminals and gangs who use and transport illegal guns?

    You mean they should do that INSTEAD of making more guns illegal to legally own?

    AND they should do that instead of making responsible, law-abiding gun owners who have never hurt anybody or done anything illegal INTO criminals?

    And we're not even going to need to discuss the possibility of increasing the scope of background, medical and psychological checks to ensure that the few who are pursuing a fully legal path to gun ownership, but are or eventually become at risk of causing harm with guns, do not get any license or legal access to firearms in the first place?

    I admit that your idea sounds like it would be great for stopping the flow of illegal guns into our country, and stopping most gun-based crime, but I don't understand, how does it hurt legitimate gun owners? I'm pretty sure that's the goal, right? I thought we didn't care about illegal guns getting into the country, only about discouraging people from owning guns and making life more difficult for people who choose to own guns while trying to live up to the acknowledged and genuine privilege of doing so, despite the bureaucratic punishments and continuous discouragement.

    /s for most of that obviously

  • Why don't police use rubber bullets instead of live rounds? I get if someone is holding a loaded weapon. But wouldn't a rubber bullet have the same effect with out putting holes in another person?

    Jump

  • The cruelty is the point.

    Individual human lives are no longer considered things of value. Only the ideology and the nation are allowed to have value. Welcome to fascism. Enjoy your stay.