It means Banksy, who has remained anonymous for more than 25 years, could finally be unmasked as he would be required to publicly disclose his name if brought to court.
Gonna be hard to bring them to court if you don’t even know their name, isn’t it?
"There is one person responsible for what happened here and that person is now in custody and will be charged soon and will be held accountable," he adds
I’m totally expecting a fair trial now.What a relief…
Not really sure which part of “Lock her up” implied “..after due process and a conviction by a trial of her peers” so this shouldn’t really be too surprising.
This person is in state custody at the moment. Of course there will be an interesting push and pull as there often is between federal and state authorities about who charges first and whether there are federal charges warranted here.
I think the idea is that all parties would find it beneficial so they would be incentivized to read it:
Leeds told Ars that the RSL standard doesn't just benefit publishers, though. It also solves a problem for AI companies, which have complained in litigation over AI scraping that there is no effective way to license content across the web.
The thing is if all parties find the terms agreeable it doesn’t matter if it’s legally binding.
It’s more like putting a price on the shelf at the grocery store. Not every one will agree the price is agreeable and you might still get shoplifters but it doesn’t mean it’s a waste of time to list the price.
I think the idea is that all parties would find it beneficial:
Leeds told Ars that the RSL standard doesn't just benefit publishers, though. It also solves a problem for AI companies, which have complained in litigation over AI scraping that there is no effective way to license content across the web.
Gonna be hard to bring them to court if you don’t even know their name, isn’t it?