Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
0
Comments
386
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Well, that's an unfortunate logo

  • Apple-store like? So, insanely expensive and of little help? Supported by modern slavery?

  • I thought that couldn't be true, but yeah, you're right. Over 400,000 active members and more than 580,000 retired members. Odd.

  • Wow, that's cool

  • ICQ was shutdown, and in Russian hands before that?

  • You just can't make this up. Satire is dead.

  • Tell me this, because this confuses me. Where are all the Tesla's supposed to go? A junkyard?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Hey, you asked. What part of your comment do you feel is being taken way too seriously?

    It's easier to (figuratively) say "You guys are just not understanding my comment. It's all of you who are wrong!" than to just take a second and understand why people don't like what you commented earlier.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • It implies that that's a quality you should be judging people on, even if their looks have no bearing on the situation.

    Of all the things or even subjects you could have made a comment on in this thread, you left one on the looks of a woman.

    She doesn't need your validation. Other Lemmy users don't need your opinion on who's attractive. It's meaningless and detracts from the conversation.

  • That sounds like a declaration of war

  • Because the people paying them think they're going to earn it back.

    When you are a well-known or household name, your presence alone can convince a lot of people to watch whatever product you're in. Not just that, entertainment is inherently a risky business. Replacing unknowns with celebrities means reducing that risk, replacing it with known factors.

    In other words, because the market thinks they're worth it.

  • Wow, some promise!

  • Well, no. 71.3% of people voted not to want this party in power. That's the power of coalitions.

  • It's such a transparent non-answer, one that religious people have been conditioned to accept and not question.

  • That would imply Trump has a plan

  • You should evaluate who you are getting your talking points from and whether it's ethical to spread such (mis)information without at least verifying it for yourself.

  • You need the challenge to be happy but you're so fragile that you can't handle the pressure. Guess I'll just go fuck myself then.

  • I'll say that, at this point, you can't even blame that fucking asshole. You can blame partisan media for not fact-checking this basic shit and having their dipshit viewers lap it up. It's broken beyond repair.