Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
帖子
0
评论
258
加入于
2 yr. ago

  • Counter argument : ww2 was completely irrelevant to all post war progresses, war against communism, which was a mortal threat to capitalism, was the key factor.

    During the cold war, capitalism had to provide comfort and progress to people, or people would have turn communist. And so it did. Until it basically won in the 70s.

    The idea that society needs war or competition incentive to do anything is the dumbest liberal mind fuck of today. It's completely wrong, but it goes with the ideology that dominates.

  • The idea that we need war for progress is dumb.

  • Ceos being scared for their life is a notable change IMO. Surveillance and repression are as usual.

  • That's not what can be understood from a comment that simply condemn violence with one example though. I mostly agree with you otherwise.

    But I am starting to change my mind recently with a simple parallel : strike is a kind of violence with a company, and it works very well. A strike in a single company can have positive effects for the people who work there. A global strike can have positive effects for everyone.

    I am starting to think that physical violence may have the same property : of course an organised revolution is the best. But in the mean time, I don't think assassinating a CEO is useless. I'm not saying it's what we should do, at least not to this day. But I am wondering: did the last such event had positive or negative effects?

  • You'll soon see what fascists do with violence. In an idealistic world, pacifism is fine. But in reality the threat of violence is still the only thing that can prevent violence from the opposing side.

    Violence has been used to shut down leftist for decades now. Pacifism did nothing to prevent capitalism from degenerating. At some point one need to accept the reality.

  • That's a lie. Capitalists will only make compromises if their lives (directly or figuratively) is in danger. That's what History demonstrates.

    Right now they're so comfortable with power and propaganda that they'd rather make fascism happen.

    Violence is the only language they understand. I'm not talking about everyone here, I'm talking about the capitalist overlords. They're ruthless monsters who only understands vital threat to their way of life or their life directly.

  • Calling US leftists extremists is the funniest joke I've read today!

    Truth is liberals are much more extremists than most leftists. At some point they will need to realise it and take responsibility for the shit they did for so long.

  • The liberals have to do their mea culpa, not the left. Right now it will soon be a matter of choosing a side : humanism or fascism. Until now the liberals always chose fascism and called the leftists dangerous extremists.

    Choose a side liberals. You made the world what it is today. And you're now blaming the leftists and asking them to support your insanity. That's not how it works. Leftists know which side they are fighting for, and they will suffer the consequences. What about you liberals?

  • You know, if leberals wanted the support of the leftists, they try something called compromises. But the only compromises they're ready to do is with the fascists unfortunately, which the leftists will never support.

    So no, the leftists didn't refuse to make compromises. The liberals did, with the left, because they actually accepted all the compromises with the fascists. And act now surprised that fascism is taking over.

    Liberals are spoiled children incapable of taking accountability for their actions.

  • And if you can earn a million each year as an alternative, why wouldn't you go for it? I love science, but we live in a real world, not in a dream, and this real world decided that science wouldn't be rewarding.

  • That's so, so stupid... They really are the dumbest of morons. They lost money, so they waste even more money and make their best workers flee.

  • It is the religion of money.

  • You can make taxes they can't avoid. And should they leave, the better a country doesn't thrive because of its billionaires but despite them.

  • The article advocate for a libertarian world. Getting rid of parents and copyright is good, imagining that competition will bring a better world is plain stupid though. It is precisely the libertarian ideal. And it only lead to neo-feudalism.

  • While I agree patent and copyright are cancer, this article reads like libertarian bullshit.

  • What do you think "it's us or chaos" is doing?

  • Liberals are causing fascism. They are directly responsible.

  • I blame the liberals because they had the power for decades and they are actively supporting the fascists in order to fight the left. They are responsible.

    But as always liberals will always, always pretend nothing is their fault. They took all the decisions for a century, but somehow they shouldn't be accountable for the problems they brought on the world. They're spoiled children if you ask me.

  • Trump is not a conservative. Fascists and reactionaries are not conservatives. Far right is not the right, eventhough the right did sliped into far right because of the liberals.