Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B

bouh

@ bouh @lemmy.world

Posts
0
Comments
258
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • 'Israel' investigates whistleblowers who leaked footage of Palestinian detainee rape

    Jump

  • Why is Israel word between quotes?

  • Sex in the ChatGPT : l’érotisme made in IA est-il un pas dans la mauvaise direction ?

    Jump

  • Développe : les deux ça veut dire quoi ?

    Parce que là, tu prônes exactement ce que je critique. Avec ces critiques, les entreprises ont le monopole de ces outils, et les lignes sont tracées sur des questions symboliques complètement inutiles, voir rétrogrades ou qui les arranges.

    Parce que les questions de pudibonderie, on fait pas beaucoup plus conservateur et en général ce sont les religieux, conservateurs ou fachos qui défendent ces idées. Qu'est-ce qu'on gagne à tracer la limite à l'usage romantique des IA ? Absolument rien. Les emplois remplaçables seront quand même remplacé, et c'est toujours derrière un carcan de brevets et de droits d'auteurs que vous allez même maintenant défendre. Qu'est-ce qu'on gagne a bannir ou limiter la pornographie ? Absolument rien. Les femmes du milieu sont toujours exploitées et le business tourne toujours autant.

    Je parle pas de grand soir. Je parle de ce qu'on peut obtenir maintenant : des outils puissant qui vont redéfinir le travail. À la place vous prônez de laisser ce rôle aux entreprises, mais attention, on touche pas au sexe.

  • Sex in the ChatGPT : l’érotisme made in IA est-il un pas dans la mauvaise direction ?

    Jump

  • Si le problème c'est l'entreprise qui collecte les données, pourquoi les attaques ciblent-elles les IA plutôt que les entreprises ?

    Quand au risques fasciste, est-ce que c'est pas un peu hors-sujet quand l'UE passé une loi pour surveiller les conversations chiffrées ?

    Je vois tellement de problèmes dans tous ces combats contre les IA ça le désole. Comme si on devait se battre pour des miettes de libertés après avoir accepté de perdre la plupart d'entre elles, et souvent dans une optique très pessimiste.

    La c'est typiquement un combat du même accabi que celui contre le porno. C'est de la pudibonderie. Défendre les droits d'auteur des artistes contre les IA, c'est défendre les droits d'auteur qui sont un des pires carcans capitaliste de notre société. Défendre le travail des gens face aux IA, c'est défendre le pseudo-esclavagisme auquel on est réduit.

    Et si on se battait pour un meilleur plutôt ? Un monde dans lequel les IA et toutes les technologies n'appartiennent pas aux entreprises mais servent la société à la place, pour améliorer nos vies, nous libérer du travail, ou nous aider à faire face aux défis du XXIeme siècle. Ou on abandonne tout espoir face au capitalisme ?

  • This definetly seem very intentional…

    Jump

  • I guess you're talking about 2024 rules? Because old 5e rules are different and don't have this flaw.

  • All the troubles with Debian upgrade

    Jump

  • I didn't have problem updating debian stable to a next version. I got problems when I jumped 2 stables at once. Which was to be expected.

  • Macron says Putin shows no intent to end war—the killing hasn’t stopped

    Jump

  • He will not do anything without at least a good part of Europe to support it.

  • What problems does Linux have to overcome to get more users

    Jump

  • It does not reduces maintenance. And it costs hard drive, and with heavy use, probably ram too

    Redundancy of dependencies in different versions, might also be loaded in ram in different version, which can add its own kind of problems in some circumstances.

    Maintenance is only reduced on the surface level. The complexity you don't see as a problem is the actual maintenance problem. It's not a problem only if you're not the one dealing with integration, maintenance or security.

  • What problems does Linux have to overcome to get more users

    Jump

  • Piling abstraction layers is bad design imo. For performances, complexity and maintenance.

  • What problems does Linux have to overcome to get more users

    Jump

  • My opinion on flatpak is that it only allows developers to be loosy with dependencies. I'm convinced it will fall appart in a decade or two because it's too messy and bloated as a technical solution.

  • What problems does Linux have to overcome to get more users

    Jump

  • There are a lot of things an average consumer don't wa't to deal with, but that's true for windows as much as Linux. The question is not what they want to do, but what they need to do and if it seems difficult.

    A command line can also be distributed as a bash script btw. The difference with an obscure executable that will edit the registry on windows it that the bash file can be checked much more easily.

  • What problems does Linux have to overcome to get more users

    Jump

  • I have a brother who is not into computers. But he has a shitty laptop (with only 3gb of ram) so windows stopped working on it (because Windows update). So I installed a Linux on it, and he is very happy with it.

    He even managed to change the desktop by himself. Installing some stuff was not obvious (like making a scanner work), but I did it guiding him by phone and text.

    Command line is in fact much easier in this case than any gui. In a gui, you must know it by heart to correctly guide the person. A command line you can fine tune it on your side, send it on discord, and he only has to copy/paste. That is much more powerful.

    And the security is not less than downloading an executable on a dubious website.

    It is true that specialist tend to overestimate the skill of unknowing people. But when it come to computer, people also forget that normal people always went for the help of specialist for their technical needs. Nothing changed.

  • What problems does Linux have to overcome to get more users

    Jump

  • I was in agreement until you talk about flatpak...

  • [Update: Valve Responds] Mastercard Denies Pressuring Steam To Censor 'NSFW' Games

    Jump

  • Except that's entirely false. Even now they are pretending they do nothing, it's the intermediaries who force things.

    Mastercard sells absolutely nothing. And they have no responsibility for anything sold. And no one ever thought it was mastercard selling or even allowing to sell illegal things.

    In fact, most people will believe no one sound of mind will buy something illegal with a credit card because mastercard and the likes will give your identity to the police.

    So it's not about illegal things, and it's not about their image.

  • [Update: Valve Responds] Mastercard Denies Pressuring Steam To Censor 'NSFW' Games

    Jump

  • What I read is that it is not about illegal content. It is about the measures taken to prevent illegal content from being sold. It's much more devious than simple censorship.

  • [Update: Valve Responds] Mastercard Denies Pressuring Steam To Censor 'NSFW' Games

    Jump

  • It's much worse than that. How they word it is "if it may damage the public image of mastercard". And they don't review the content, they review the means used to prevent the damage to their brand.

    So valve doesn't even need to have anything that actually damage mastercard brand, it just need to be that mastercard is not comfortable enough with the measures used to prevent it.

  • Mastercard release a statement about game stores, payment processors and adult content

    Jump

  • In fact this statement states that they ask their clients to litteraly do the job of justice. That's quite scary.

    Ensuring a card cannot be used to buy illegal content.

    That means they can shut you down if they think you didn't do enough, which is literally their whim.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • How do you pay for a steam game without a credit card?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • They have the power because states gave it to them. States can very easily take it back. But they won't because they're corrupted assholes.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Censorship is always the first step. Genocide is the last step. People getting mad when the first step toward fascism is crossed is a very good thing to fight fascism and try to prevent a future genocide. This is exactly what the poem is about : react on the first step, because it will be too late when the genocide starts.