Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
2
Comments
163
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • I'm really pissed of this "I'm sad 'cause I'm poor. So if I had money I would be happy."

    (Poverty imply sadness) does not imply (wealth imply hapiness). That's basic formal logic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraposition The Contraposition is (not sadness imply not poverty). So, If you are happy, you have money.

    Expressed differently, if all the poor are sad, we can state that a happy person is not poor. But we cannot state anything about a rich person being happy or not.

  • The fuck ???

    It's the name of pilot's mother: Enola Gay Tibbets !!! It has nothing to do with LGBTQRSTwhatever !!!

  • We have a long history of complaining and resisting to quite anything, bad or good. And also cutting head from time to time.

  • Aucun soucis 😊 Si ça t'avais intéressé, je serai de toute façon passé par ebay ou leboncoin et je t'aurai envoyé l'annonce.

    Si t'as des questions sur le montage hésite pas. C'est surper bien expliqué mais on sait jamais.

  • https://github.com/tompi/cheapino

    La liste d'achat est ici: https://github.com/tompi/cheapino/blob/master/doc/orderingguide.md

    J'ai suivi la liste, à part pour les keycaps où je voulais des low profiles.

    C'est pas exactement 50€ le clavier, mais vue que t'achète les pièce est gros, tu t'en tire à ~100€ pour 2 clavier 1/2. Genre, t'achète pas 36 diodes. T'achète un paquet de 100. Tu peux tirer encore les prix si tu veux te lancer dans le business du clavier 🤣

    Je peux te revendre celui que j'ai fais à 50€. PM moi si tu veux des détails.

  • Pareil. Je voulais vraiment m'y mettre, je me suis fait un cheapino pour ~50€. Pas moyen d'écrire quoi que ce soit de correct 😟 Au moins je me suis perfectionné en soudure.

  • Thank you !

    Provider providing oil to consumer: It's the fault of the providers !

    Provider providing black slaves to white consummers: It's the fault of consumers !

    What an hypocrisy...

  • More something like 50% nuclear, 40% renewable, but we also sell lot of nuclear electricity to Germany. Hydraulic is very well used. We have hydrolic power plant everywhere it's possible. Not many people know this. "Hell ya, why don't we build more hydrolic plant ?!" Well, because we already did 😅

  • Nah, we put things on fire only when some random dealer get shot by a cop.

  • France has ban drilling new Wells on its territory. For now, despite oil lobbying, ban is still applied :) The problem with geothermy is more a social and legal problem. No one care about drilling in the middle of north sea. But geothermic should be drill close to population. And suddenly, everyone becomes afraid of earthquake, and you need dozens of authorizations.

  • SLB had acquired Celsius Energy, a company that deploy low depth geothermal solution. They are also partner with Genvia to developpe hydrogen. And have also plans for offshore wind turbines. Oil company all have plan to transition to new energy. Then know oil is not a long terme business. The problem is doing the transition while making money. If you dont make money, you die. And if you die, you cannot do transition. Unfortunately, oil still generate shitload of money...

  • Curently waiting for my train. That's exactly what juste happen...

  • Brave.

    Because I installed it when it was pre-alpha version. Ended up to an ugly window with just an addresse bar. I though "this shit will never worked, yet another utopistic project, too bad..."

    Then, came back 2 years later, gave him a 2nd chance and "OMG ! They fucking did it !". So I keep it as a redemption for not having believed in the project at first.

  • Come to France, we have cheeze, and wine, and bread 🥖🍾🥐🧀

  • You doesn't seems to be the kind of person with whom can have constructive argument. I gave you facts and number. Sorry I cannot take my time machine and go back 200 years back telling Great Britain to stop burning coal.

    Also, my company has as objective to becomes neutral by 2030 and 20% carbon negative by 2050. Locally, we have decreased our electricity consumption by 20% since 2022 and put in place mobility actions to push people taking bike or bus. Nearly half of employees use soft transport (public, bikes, onewheel, etc...)

    We cannot rewrite the past or snap finger to change habits of 8billions peoples.

    We will be juge on our current actions and futur results. As of today, we are trying something which we hope is going to the right direction. But its always easier to criticize and not doing anything.

  • Global Co2 production of human activities is about 35Gt per year (https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions). Forests absorb around 7.5Gt per year (https://www.wri.org/insights/forests-absorb-twice-much-carbon-they-emit-each-year). Let say we double the total amount of forest in the whole planet, and we cut Co2 production by half. We are very roughly 15Gt produce VS 15Gt absorb. Is the problem solved ? Nope.

    First, because these forests has to stay in place, or used as building material but cannot be burn to for heating. So we still have to plant extra forest for heating. Second, we still have all the Co2 we have put in atmosphere since a century. So the goal is not to be equilibrium, but to be net negative.

    Worldwide CCS capacity has been estimated between 8,000 and 55,000 gigatonnes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_capture_and_storage). And, yes, it is already carbon negative, and already in production in several countries with currently a net result of ~50Mt Co2 per year (https://www.statista.com/statistics/726634/large-scale-carbon-capture-and-storage-projects-worldwide-capacity/)

    There is not a unique solution "Plant Trees and go electric" to global warming. There are lots of solutions, with pros and cons. CCS is just a small part of the equation. Use renewable energy, use storage (litthium batteries, Hydrogen, ...), Nuclear, change habit to consume less, plant trees and develop carbon capture solution.

    The problem won't be solved with a unique solution, but by finding the good balance between all the possibilities. And those who know it won't work are please to let those who doesn't know try.

  • Geological reservoirs are thousands metter depth and several dozen of km wide. Pressure is a few MPa, and temperature hundreds of °C. Condition are so extrem that filling them with gaz barely change anything. Especially if they were already filled with gaz dozen years ago. Furthemore, they are not big vacum like most people imagine. It's more like giant spongy rock, like sand. It's not a baloon you inflate or deflate.

    CCS facilities are not in competition with forest. It's a complementatry solution. If you manage to capture carbon next to poluting factories, you don't spread Co2 on the atmosphere, waiting it to be captured by a forest the other side of the globe. And they can be powered by solar panels.

  • What do you mean ?

  • Agree, carbon capture process is quite efficient now. I'm working on (pretty big) company doing Carbon Capture and Sequestration. The idea is to use empty oil&gaz reservoir to inject back carbon where it comes from. So there are several advantage:

    • The land is already messed up by former drilling platerform. No need to shave another forest to create a facility
    • No waste to handle, as the captured carbon is injected in the underground. We also study the possibility to inject other kind of waste, like domestic ones.
    • Simplified process as we can keep Co2 in gaz state to inject back in former natural gaz reservoir. Not even needed to extract carbon to solodify it.
    • Yes, trees are much more efficient and eco-friendly, but sometime we cannot just plant billions of trees. Whereas a CCS facility is relatively small compared to a whole forest.