Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
4
Comments
234
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • What's the threshold here - on and off again with their ex type rough times, or ongoing cancer battle

  • Eat cat food until I feel sick and go to sleep before the cat fights start.

  • My partner played lots of outdoor sport in his youth so he has some skin damage but from his mid 20s when I met him I encouraged proper sun safe behaviours and to moisturise. We live in Australia for Christ sake, this sun is not fucking around.

    He's got mates of all ages but some of the blokes in their late 20s seem to think looking after their skin is a feminine trait and they play outdoor sports. When he's been out with these guys, people think he's the youngest despite being over 10 years their senior.

    It's so silly. Put some sunblock on and moisturize. It's not that hard.

  • Not sure if you've ever worked an office job or not but don't underestimate the exhaustion you can get from sitting at a computer all day. Nursing is extremely demanding so you're obviously no stranger to hard work and exhaustion - but maybe give the office work a go for a bit and see how you feel.

    I used to scoff at the idea that a 9-5 office job could be tiring when I had a more physical job. Turns out it really can be, just in a different way.

    Try things out and then see if the extra money is worth losing your weekend respite.

  • Oh I read your responses and it confirmed my initial thoughts.

    I had nothing useful to provide you in terms of your original post and others have attempted here and you seem happy with their answers.

    But I don't read tripe like the reductive, false waffle that guy wrote and not call it out. I write how I speak. I don't speak in slogans so I'm not sure what you're referring to.

    I'm likely old in relative terms to you, yes. Young isn't an insult. It's contextualising my scorn (to use your word) for his response to someone who is.

    You're pretty fired up in your responses to me. I only hope you grow to direct that passion towards people espousing that drivel he wrote instead.

  • I have very few feelings of generosity for men explaining the apparently concrete and defined preferences of women, especially when they're the dated, stereotypical and unfounded assertions that underpin the incel and PUA ideologies.

    OP seems young and naive given the content of her question. His response to her gives her the impression of experience and a confidence in 'how things are' and it's 4chan bullshit.

    I'll save my generosity for people more deserving.

  • Sounds perfectly cromulent.

  • Fair to middling?

  • I'm absolutely spiffing, thanks for asking! Yourself?

  • But just those 2 right? Because that's... How our brains are wired or something? Based on... Something you saw in a movie from 1997 or something?

  • Are you ok

  • Did you just... Say all cis women are attracted to 2 types men? A 'stud' and a 'dependable' type? Because they are also the only types and never shall the two combine?

    Like, all of us women? All of us?

    Which cartoon told you this? And who told you to repeat this strange teen movie trope with such a sense of confidence?

    Wtaf

  • Fucked my libido so bad. After my second implant I couldn't do it anymore.

  • Walking to get a coffee is when I've solved some of the most complex problems in my head. Walking to get a coffee was also one of the few times I'd leave my desk. What even was lunch...

  • His stumbling over the sentence cadence made him accidentally say the opposite. He meant to say that he wouldn't have picked her for VP if she wasn't qualified for president - think about it, that that's a far more normal thing for him to have said and I'm positive what he meant. He just tripped over the words.

  • This is clearly AI. I hate you.

  • There's some lovely filth down here!

  • That's the fun part of far side.

    When you don't immediately get it you have to wonder:

    1. Is it a reference to something at the time that's not within my lifetime/country's zeitgeist?
    2. Is it a play on an idiom or common cliche?
    3. Is it literally nonsense and absurdity for the sake of it?
    4. Am I just a big dummy?

    I think it might be just 3, i.e. the absurdity of this happening at all, that he's concerned about the coconuts without realising/or being concerned that his head is sprouting a palm tree, and that Margaret seems irritated that he's woken her for what her expression suggests is either an incident of his own making, or one that's trivial.

    But his body looks weird so it could be 2, 'no man is an island' or something.

    I'm in my late 30s and Australian so it could be 1.

    It's never 4.

  • I heard that, at least in countries where we read left to right, we also look for things left to right. And if you reverse this and look from right to left that you're more likely to notice something you otherwise missed. So I do that. But I have no data to confirm if it works...