Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
1
Comments
357
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I prefer appwrite if I could choose. Check them out of you don't need all the bells and whistles of supabase

  • Maybe like Open Policy Agent (OPA) but with Yaml instead of Rego?

  • Isn't it to keep the copyright notice and not the license itself? I.e, you may redistribute it with a different license term and conditions but the copyright notice must be retained. I don't know how different it is tho in legal speak. Maybe they are equivalent.

  • I always see people with the argument that the developer labour is somehow being exploited. But have you never thought that maybe, just maybe, the person in question does not care? He just wanted to publish his creation and be done with it. He does not care if people are using it. That's my case. I don't care if people want to use my piece of cryptographic library. Just be aware that I am just some random dude, providing no support nor warranty. I make the library for my use cases and it works fine.

  • Oh he is crazy alright. Just look at his videos making guitar hero... USING GUITAR!

  • Not really, you can charge for GPL software, but you must always provide the source and anyone may redistribute those

  • Ahh, yes. I read the official installation and it is indeed written in bold. AMD hardware with NVME drive targeted towards handheld. Yeah, would be nice for generic desktop too for living room PC.

  • Iirc, the requirement is basically a computing device than runs using AMD processor (I forgot about the GPU part, but maybe it must be AMD too), and uses NVME SSD. So, most modern system?

  • No.

    MIT : "Here is my project. Do whatever, I don't care. Just put my name in a credit somewhere."

    GPL (assuming FSF stance on linking is used) : "Here is my project. Oh, you want to use my project and distribute your project that uses my project? Make your whole project open source too."

    BSD-3 : "Here is my project. Credit me and do whatever but, don't use my name to promote your usage."

    And many more nuances on other licenses like patents and whatnot. The problem is, the average person does not care to enforce it.

  • Genius!

    Jump
  • Does that term come from linguistics? I'd like to learn more about it

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Isn't the term already exists now? Executive Dysfunction

  • Oh no... Is there no alternative as of now? (I use J2K)

  • Uhh, yes it did? CPU time costs money too. What used to take milliseconds now takes a seconds WILL cost them money. And usually CPU time is the most expensive one too while bandwidth is cheap.

  • I was looking for this comment. I knew someone from Lemmy would have seen that

  • Is copyleft a requirement for FOSS?

  • Or maybe people don't care about what their project looks like after releasing it?

    P1 : Hey, I've used your code in my company project! P2 : Cool. I've got another job to do.

    End

  • Maybe it is a violation when you are doing it all the time? Like, 24/7 you are using the whole resources available. Then yeah, I could see it.

  • Alright, fair point that it is detection and not diagnosis even if it means being pedantic. But everything else that an AI capable of is also not to be dismissed.

  • Do you know what else is math? Probability and statistics. AI cannot do math because it is not a suitable task for it. Seriously, who TF thinks that a rigorous well defined process should be fed into a statistical blackbox.

    it is similar, know why? it's fucking engineering, which is an entire branch of math!

    Do you know what else the engineer uses to optimize a product design? The answer may surprise you...