Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)C
Posts
3
Comments
268
Joined
5 yr. ago

Caretaker of Sunhillow/DS8.ZONE. Free (Libre) Software enthusiast and promoter. Pronouns: any

Also /u/CaptainBeyondDS8 on reddit and CaptainBeyond on libera.chat.

AI Disclosure: No "generative AI tools" are used to produce any work attributed to "Captain Beyond of Sunhillow" (here or elsewhere).

  • They may be talking about F-Droid Basic

  • Given that the server end is self-hostable one could just bundle the frontend and the backend into a single package and run that as an app. I imagine that might be a bit too much though.

  • "It's not foss but something something privacy..." Proprietary software, not even once.

  • "AI" is whatever (it's a meaningless buzzword - some "AI features" I like and some I don't care about) but proprietary is a dealbreaker.

  • Why does it need to be proprietary?

  • No but you see Linux is good and holy and Google is evil, so anything it touches becomes evil and corrupt. Android and ChromeOS cannot be Real Linux because they are corrupted by evil Google cooties.

  • Switching to a proprietary license doesn't "fund open source" it funds proprietary software

    Which, fine, if your business model is incompatible with an open source license then sure. But don't present it as something it isn't

    Edit: You can dual license under a strong copyleft (strong enough to scare moochers away) and a proprietary license (fauxpen or traditional).

  • There should be a law that any time someone uses the word slam in a news context it should be about someone literally being slammed.

  • As I understand it the sandboxed google apps are entirely optional. You can go completely free with GrapheneOS just like with LineageOS.

  • Source availability is necessary but not sufficient for 2 of the 4 freedoms.

  • Thankfully Immich is protected against rugpulls (i.e. becoming proprietary) by virtue of it not requiring a Contributor License Agreement (CLA), so FUTO doesn't even own the copyrights to the code. Therefore, if anyone is suspicious of FUTO's influence over the project, they can simply fork it (and I imagine someone will)

    But if you have something doing face detection I would hope it's stored locally and not sent to a "cloud" no matter who runs it.

  • "good" is subjective but FUTO's software is non-free. Their attempts to openwash their proprietary license is enough of a red flag.

  • No, he was just a talking head that they hired a while ago. According to some in this thread he's no longer with them today, but I don't have a source for that.

  • "FULU" is a consumer rights organization iirc. The name sounds like a spinoff or sister organization to FUTO, but I don't think there's an official relationship.

  • FUTO has always been sus, but privacy redditors gave them a pass because of Rossmann's involvement.

  • Blocking internet access doesn't magically turn proprietary software into free software.