Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
2
Comments
313
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Probably the doctor

  • Fry making Walter Koenig say it as Chekov

  • "Escort our f****** guests to their quarters"

  • Strawman

  • AI is slop. This is about how a grand averaging machine can mislead people and harm your valid business/reputation/etc

  • Virgeon

  • I had a TA for my quantum class tell us, "Look, I know you're all working together or sharing homework. But I'll see who knows the material when I grade your exams."

  • Pokeball

    Jump
  • It's a shocked frowny face

  • I've been doing the wrong rain dance

  • I think it was John Oliver who did a segment on dollar stores being the scavengers in a dying economy. They might thrive here

  • This is fair. I was just thinking that my short haired dog wouldn't sleep on pavement, but it could be something else

  • Had the same thought. Kind of heartbreaking that it chose to sleep on pavement instead of the pile of leaves in the background

  • Yeeaahhh I tried to watch it again a couple years ago and had a hard time with the first few episodes

  • Oh wow. I saw this show when I was like 8 or something and it stuck with me, even though I can't remember why

  • I disagree here. Rent is a siphon for your money to go to the wealthy landowners, just like these rising housing prices siphon more of your money to banks.

    Unless you're saying that renters have more political leverage? Which I'm also not sure I agree with. It's easier to evict a renter than an owner. I think we need more affordable housing, which depends on building accessible homes, controlling outrageous rent, and addressing zoning laws, but all of this depends on a strong economy for those goods and a surplus of jobs that pay enough. Systemic reform of zoning laws and lobbying is where change is

  • So it sounds like a rock and a hard place. Homeowners don't want to lose money (and for many doing so would destroy their financial well-being), but they're also incentivized by banks and realtors to ask higher and higher prices. This also affects voting patterns (i.e. "I bought at an astronomical cost and if it loses value I'm fucked"). But it all sounds like the homeowner is caught between market forces that propel prices higher. The relatively recent introduction of blackrock to corporate homeownership has an outsized impact, like your example, where they spend a ridiculous amount for a property they intend to never sell which will also inflate the property value in a region. I'd be curious to see how that difference could be quantified and understood. Honestly it all feels like 2008 again

    This is just anecdotal experience, but when I bought my house I was the only bidder who needed a place to live. The seller and the people I bid against were all looking for rental properties. I honestly only got the place through a fluke

  • If I were to guess it serves two purposes:

    1. To dampen the reaction when absolutely wailing on some piece of shit steel that warped
    2. Accidentally getting welded to things

    Edit: I looked it up! Number 1 is correct! Also, they're used to remove slag

  • Slowly? I have a full on Deutsch conversion

  • Can you explain how? I fail to see how families owning a single home to live in is more extractive than megacorps and banks leveraging leviathan assets to create an artificial shortage and rent market