I think the thing we are trying to regulate is the muscular advantage imparted by certain hormones over certain periods of time. Whether the person being measured has been labeled male or female doesn't make any difference.
There's a single quote of half a sentence from the New York Post, other than that where is the "right wing campaign"? Referencing Twitter and quoting other journalists does not equal journalism. Moreover, I see no reference at all to women being "purged" from women's sports. This story is 98% opinion and 2% facts.
This isn't about the external genitalia, not sure why you keep going there. This is about the levels of hormones over an amount of time that is known to impart a muscular advantage. The IOC needs a formula for this to decide who can be in the class. This would not be a determination of who is female.
Why isn't this labeled as an opinion piece? There's nothing in here to substantiate the headline and almost no journalism. I'm not used to work like this from The Intercept.
I think elemental cadmium is toxic, I'm not sure CdS is. It is used in many many light detecting circuits. I think the CdS is used as a catalyst here anyway, so not depleted in use.
Do you want to make terrorists? Because this is how you make desperate people feel like their only option is to become terrorists.