Sure. Here's a video you may find interesting. It seems like in this particular case, most of the criticisms of the work assume it's either talking about a different kind of anarchist than it may be talking about, or is agreeing with the work. https://youtu.be/_pRnSPzYGAU
- Posts
- 1
- Comments
- 36
- Joined
- 2 yr. ago
- Posts
- 1
- Comments
- 36
- Joined
- 2 yr. ago
A ton of the most popular anarchist lit, which is right wing and of the objectivist school such as The Problem of Political Authority, isn't read by either socialists or left wing anarchists. I don't think it's neccesarily true that anarchist lit is unified enough to re-affirm a unified position. I do however think that anarchists hate reading longer works critiquing anarchism because many of them are written by people like Stalin, who as we all know killed every human being on earth multiple times and therefore his books on dialectical materialism and Socialism or Anarchism are ontologically invalid. That such criticisms of personal character also apply to their own authors is invalid because the only crime worse than causing harm is Possessing Power which, as is unfalsifiable, mutates the human spirit and corrupts in ways that make all existing revolutionary efforts that aren't anarchist invalid.