I'll be honest, I was just throwing a guess out at who might challenge this, as a cynical joke. Feels completely disgusting that it was a bullseye and there is already a similar case as precedent.
I certainly did not. I have seen your pattern of behavior calling everyone who even slightly disagrees with you a genocidal Netanyahu stan. That is what I am commenting on, not the isolated incident of you doing it yet again. Not the strawman you are whining about "I'm only saying genocide is wrong." You are behaving as the other LARPers do. Constant trolling intentionally to provoke arguments.
You are therefore a liar and a MAGA, as proven by your own behavior regarded with your own standards of evidence.
I don't give the slightest fuck what a MAGA thinks of me. Go give your benefit of the doubt to your LARPing far-right colleagues.
Case in point. It's not "everyone who disagrees with me," it is specifically disingenuous trolls. You see it as everyone because there is little difference between a troll and yourself.
You write some of the exact same shit as the LARPing Trumpers. Everyone is genocidal unless they agree with absolutely everything you say and do. In fact the only difference between you and them is when you get questioned why Donald is preferable. Then it is "oh, I am voting for Harris, though."
It makes more sense to assume you are indeed a MAGA trying to depress turnout and only lying about your vote to avoid criticism. Truly disgusting how you live a life of deceit. Utterly despicable that you choose to use this to support Repubs expansion of conflict and genocide.
God couldn't possibly be mad at them. Despite doing the opposite of many things Jesus taught, they must be right. The man on the big stage at the hundred-million dollar church told them so.
Right, only you are allowed to sling accusations. And if anyone calls you a MAGA it is because they are genocidal. They should have known from the context of you writing the exact same thing as the people who "couldn't possibly vote for anyone but Jill Stein" that you are both against the genocide and know that Donald will be worse.
Sure. But unfortunately the country is so diseased with far-right radicals that even for people absolutely opposed to Gaza as a primary motivation, such as Uncommitted (you going to call them genocidal as well?), she is still the least bad option.
But that's kinda my point, though. Anybody with radical ideas like "Donald will make this worse," will fail .ml purity testing, regardless of their stance on economics. And so much so that you'll call them a goose-stepper.
I don't know why anyone should give a fuck even if Harris lied about working at McDonald's. If she lied, the lie is so soft it neither compares against the worst things she's done nor does it register against Donald's absolute tsunami of falsehoods.
Right? The system is awful that lite is the best of the options that will actually happen. And yet here you are, every day campaigning for fascism deluxe by telling everyone who chooses lite that they are genocidal goose-steppers.
Clinton should have been impeached for the ridiculous power imbalance but Repubs are pretty comfortable with rapey situations and full-on rapists so they went with something else.
I'll be honest, I was just throwing a guess out at who might challenge this, as a cynical joke. Feels completely disgusting that it was a bullseye and there is already a similar case as precedent.